Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, concise audit skill with strong workflow sequencing and explicit validation feedback loops. Its main weakness is bundle completeness: the executable scorer, validator script, and most referenced materials are not included, leaving a standalone reader able to collect observations but not fully execute or follow the primary reference path.
Suggestions
Bundle the executable artifacts the body depends on — the deterministic scorer and `validate-audit-artifact.py` — or clearly separate host-repo-only references from bundled ones so the full audit is runnable from the skill alone.
The Reference Materials section lists roas-benchmark.md, measurement-protocol.md, auditor-runbook.md, and scoring-semantics.md, none of which exist in the bundle; include them or note that they require the full repo/plugin install.
Resolve the dangling sibling-skill and `../../../protocol/offer-claims-registry` links (or mark them as cross-skill repo references) so progressive-disclosure navigation actually resolves within the bundle.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean, expert-oriented body with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows; terse sections and shorthand references assume competence, with only minor restatement of veto controls — not the padded, explanatory anchor 1. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Gives concrete typed states, exact paths, an env-var one-liner, and a named validation script, but the deterministic scorer and `validate-audit-artifact.py` are not bundled, so the full workflow is not copy-paste executable from the bundle alone — matching the 'concrete but incomplete' anchor 2. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear numbered scoring sequence, an explicit Validation Checkpoints checklist, and a validate → Write → revalidate feedback loop with fail-closed `NOT_SCORED` handling for the destructive persistence step. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure and reference signaling are good (Reference Materials section, one-level links), but most referenced files (runbook, scoring-semantics, roas-benchmark, measurement-protocol, runtime-invocation, the validator script, sibling skills) are absent from the actual bundle, so navigation does not resolve standalone. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |