Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a tightly written, contract-driven overview: sequenced instructions with NEEDS_INPUT error handling, a done-when checklist, and clearly signaled external references. Its main weaknesses are repetition of the scope boundary across three sections and reliance on reference files that live outside this skill's directory (and are absent from the bundle), which slightly weakens both conciseness and navigation.
Suggestions
State the scope boundary ("does not build campaigns/match types") once — in the Scope guard section — and cut the duplicate from the intro paragraph and Next Best Skill section to reclaim tokens.
Consolidate the three separate campaign-architect links (Skill Contract, Scope guard, Reference Materials, Next Best Skill) into one handoff point to reduce redundancy.
Add a short worked example of the expected segment-plan/handoff-summary output inline (or ensure the referenced skill-contract.md ships within the skill bundle) so the output format is self-contained rather than dependent on an external ../../../references path.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and assumes competence ("Missing columns become NEEDS_INPUT flags, not guesses"), but the scope boundary is stated three times — in the intro ("this skill does not build campaigns"), the description, and the Scope guard paragraph — and campaign-architect is linked in three separate sections, so minor trimming is possible. This fits the 4 anchor ("efficient; minor instances of over-explanation") rather than the every-token-earns-its-place bar at 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The seven numbered steps give concrete, executable direction with specifics — segment name examples (`repeat-buyers-90d`, `pricing-page-visitors`), a suppression window ("14–30 days"), ROAS A weights (0.15/0.30/0.10), and an exact save path template — which for an instruction-only skill meets the mostly-executable 4 anchor. It falls short of 5 because the actual output artifact (handoff summary / segment plan format) is delegated to an external skill-contract.md reference rather than shown, leaving a minor gap in copy-paste-ready coverage. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The workflow is a clearly sequenced 7-step process with explicit error-recovery loops ("Missing columns become NEEDS_INPUT flags, not guesses"; "mark the affected bucket NEEDS_INPUT rather than fabricating it") and a validation checklist in the contract ("Done when: each audience is named and grounded in an exported column..."), plus a user-confirmation checkpoint before saving. This matches the 5 anchor's explicit validation steps and feedback loops rather than the 4 anchor, whose "minor validation gaps" are not present. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a well-organized ~65-line overview with clearly labeled sections and a Reference Materials list that signals each file's purpose, and no detail is nested more than one level. It stops at 4 because the referenced paths (../../../references/skill-contract.md, ../../../CONNECTORS.md, ../campaign-architect/SKILL.md) escape the skill directory and no bundle files (references/, scripts/, assets/) actually exist alongside this SKILL.md, so navigation depends on an external repo layout — an organization gap versus the clean one-level-deep structure at 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |