Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized, mostly lean instruction body with concrete sequenced guidance, a Done-when checkpoint, and clear scope guarding. It would reach the top tier by trimming the re-echoed intro/contract redundancy and co-locating (or inlining a fallback for) the referenced repo-level files.
Suggestions
Remove the restated description in the opening paragraph and any content the Skill Contract duplicates from the Instructions, since the frontmatter already carries the summary.
Add an explicit validate-then-fix feedback loop (e.g., re-check NEEDS_INPUT flags and re-confirm the funnel map is platform-neutral before saving) to lift workflow_clarity.
Either co-locate the referenced files (skill-contract.md, roas-benchmark.md, CONNECTORS.md, SECURITY.md) inside the skill bundle or inline a one-line fallback so progressive disclosure does not depend on unverifiable external paths.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — no padding explaining what an audience or CRM is — but the opening paragraph restates the description and the Skill Contract partially re-echos the instructions, leaving minor instances that could be trimmed. It sits above the score-3 anchor (efficient with light redundancy) but not fully at 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Seven numbered steps give concrete, specific guidance with real examples (`repeat-buyers-90d`, `high-AOV`, 14–30 day exclusion windows, ROAS A weights 0.15/0.30/0.10); as an instruction-only planning skill this is actionable without code, though it stops short of copy-paste-ready artifacts, placing it at 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 7-step process with an explicit "Done when" checklist serving as a validation checkpoint and NEEDS_INPUT flags for missing columns; this is a research/planning skill so the destructive-batch cap does not apply, but it lacks an explicit validate-then-fix feedback loop, holding it at 4. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-structured into clear sections with one-level-deep, clearly signaled references (skill-contract.md, roas-benchmark.md, CONNECTORS.md, SECURITY.md, sibling SKILL.md files); however no bundle files exist under references/scripts/assets and the referenced paths point outside the skill into a parent repo that cannot be verified here, a minor organization gap keeping it below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |