Conciseness

The body never explains concepts Claude already knows, but the same governance constraints (opaque refs, raw locators stay transient, fresh exact authorization, never invent values) are restated across Skill Contract, Instructions, and the tracker paragraphs in dense legalese ('qualified-resolver-backed opaque ref', 'single non-forked current head'), so it could be materially tightened.

Actionability

Concrete, executable instruction guidance: explicit mode-selection rules ('plan-only | tracker-only | both'), nine ordered steps each mapped to a named template block, exact save paths (memory/influencer/campaign-planner/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>.md), and named artifacts/authorizations; minor gaps remain because the 'five-kind control schema' and §10 gate checklist are delegated to references rather than stated.

Workflow Clarity

Clear sequence with explicit validation and error recovery: a mode gate precedes all work, steps 1–9 run in order with template mapping, binding gaps return NEEDS_INPUT instead of proceeding, validation failures surface 'PARTIAL CHECKPOINT COVERAGE — NOT CLOSE-ELIGIBLE', and failed gates route to creator-content-auditor — matching the checklist-plus-feedback-loop anchor.

Progressive Disclosure

References are one level deep, verified to exist (references/templates.md contains §§1–10 and the cited worked example; references/influencer-tiers.md exists), and clearly signaled with anchors and per-file descriptions in a Reference Materials section; however, ~104 lines of dense contract prose are inlined in SKILL.md itself, which is heavier than the lean-overview anchor.

Specificity

Lists several concrete actions — 'produces the plan and, when requested, a non-canonical evidence tracker with scoped identity, publication, reconciliation, close, and reopen receipts' — matching the several-specific-actions anchor; it falls short of 5 because phrases like 'scoped identity' and 'receipts' describe internal artifact machinery rather than user-facing capabilities.

Completeness

Explicitly answers both: what ('produces the plan and, when requested, a non-canonical evidence tracker...') and when ('Use when the user asks to "plan an influencer campaign"...') with concrete quoted trigger phrases, plus explicit out-of-scope guidance.

Trigger Term Quality

Good coverage of natural phrases users would say ('plan an influencer campaign', 'build a campaign blueprint', 'track or close a creator campaign', 'record a late campaign correction') plus Chinese synonyms (达人营销策划/种草方案/活动追踪与关账); not 5 because common variants such as 'influencer marketing plan' or 'creator program' are absent.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear niche with explicit disambiguation — 'Not for individual creator briefs — use brief-generator; not for overall product launches without creators — use launch-tier-planner; not for sending, publishing, amplifying, or paying' — making wrong-skill triggering unlikely.