CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

content-quality-auditor

Use when auditing content quality, E-E-A-T, or publish readiness; runs a typed 80-item CORE-EEAT profile with evidence coverage, veto checks, and a fix plan. Not for structural tags/headers alone — use on-page-seo-checker; not for domain/citation trust — use domain-authority-auditor. 内容质量/EEAT评分

70

Quality

88%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-structured, highly actionable auditor contract with explicit validation feedback loops and a clear verdict/handoff logic, appropriately splitting detail into reference files. Its main weakness is mild redundancy across the reference-listing sections rather than token inefficiency from over-explanation.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is information-dense with no padding of concepts Claude already knows, but it repeats the same reference list across 'Runtime Reads', 'Runtime Contract', and 'Reference Materials', so not every token earns its place — efficient with minor trimmable redundancy rather than fully lean.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides copy-paste-ready commands — `python3 "$AARON_SKILLS_ROOT/scripts/rubric-score.py" score <run.json>`, the validate-audit-artifact invocation, and env resolution — plus an explicit NOT_SCORED fallback when the runtime is absent, covering the common cases.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Clear sequenced process (Required Setup → Evidence Procedure → scorer execution → Report → Verdict → Persistence) with explicit validation checkpoints, a dedicated Validation Checkpoints checklist, veto handling, and a validate-then-revalidate-then-claim-saved feedback loop for the destructive persistence step.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

References are one level deep and split across appropriate files (benchmark, runbook, scoring semantics, bundled auditor-runtime), with the bundled references confirmed present; minor organization gaps come from the same paths being listed redundantly across three sections and the mix of external vs. bundled runtime references.

4 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is strong: it pairs a concrete what with an explicit when, uses natural trigger terms, and adds clear boundary guidance to avoid routing conflicts. The only soft spot is action specificity, which stays at the profile/evidence/veto level rather than enumerating granular actions.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists several concrete actions — 'runs a typed 80-item CORE-EEAT profile with evidence coverage, veto checks, and a fix plan' — but the actions are somewhat high-level for an auditor ('evidence coverage', 'veto checks') rather than granular, leaving minor coverage gaps relative to the comprehensive anchor.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ('runs a typed 80-item CORE-EEAT profile with evidence coverage, veto checks, and a fix plan') and when ('Use when auditing content quality, E-E-A-T, or publish readiness') with concrete trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Good natural-term coverage with 'auditing content quality', 'E-E-A-T', and 'publish readiness' — phrases users would actually say — but not the comprehensive synonym set of the top anchor, so it sits just below 5.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear niche with explicit boundary guidance — 'Not for structural tags/headers alone — use on-page-seo-checker; not for domain/citation trust — use domain-authority-auditor' — minimizing overlap with adjacent skills.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Validation

81%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation13 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_field

'metadata' should map string keys to string values

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

relative_links

Relative link issues: 9 suspicious

Warning

Total

13

/

16

Passed

Repository
aaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.