Conciseness

The body is dense and prescriptive with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows, but the five runtime-read files are listed twice ("Runtime Reads" and again under "Runtime Contract") and pinned version numbers ("schema_version: 3.0", "runbook_version: 3.0.0") add time-sensitive tokens outside any deprecated section — minor trims, not padding, so anchor 4 over 3 or 5.

Actionability

Copy-paste-ready commands ("python3 \"$AARON_SKILLS_ROOT/scripts/rubric-score.py\" score <run.json>", the validate-audit-artifact.py invocation with flags), exact required declarations, concrete report templates, and worked examples with real numbers (raw 78 → final 59, cap_applied: true) fully cover common cases, with an explicit fallback when the runtime is absent.

Workflow Clarity

The sequence (Required Setup → Evidence Procedure steps 1-6 → verdict mapping) is explicit, backed by a dedicated "Validation Checkpoints" checklist and feedback loops (validate → fix → revalidate; return NOT_SCORED when the runtime is missing), matching the anchor-5 pattern.

Progressive Disclosure

The three bundled reference files are real and well signaled from a Reference Materials section, but six referenced paths escape the bundle (../../../references/auditor-runbook.md, scoring-semantics.md, core-eeat-benchmark.md, framework-catalog.json, runtime-invocation.md, humanizer-slop.md) and do not resolve here, and references/item-reference.md itself chains to ../../../../references/core-eeat-benchmark.md — a second-level nest with unresolved navigation, fitting anchor 3 rather than 4.

Specificity

"runs a typed 80-item CORE-EEAT profile with evidence coverage, veto checks, and a fix plan" lists several concrete actions, exceeding the 1-2 actions of anchor 3, but the actions are partially wrapped in proprietary jargon ("typed 80-item CORE-EEAT profile") rather than the plain comprehensive action list of anchor 5.

Completeness

Both what ("runs a typed 80-item CORE-EEAT profile with evidence coverage, veto checks, and a fix plan") and when ("Use when auditing content quality, E-E-A-T, or publish readiness") are explicitly stated with concrete trigger phrases, matching anchor 5; anchor 4's weaker 'when' does not apply.

Trigger Term Quality

"auditing content quality, E-E-A-T, or publish readiness" plus the bilingual "内容质量/EEAT评分" gives good natural-phrase coverage a user would say, but common variations like "content audit" or "quality check" are missing, short of anchor 5's comprehensive synonym coverage.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

It proactively routes away from siblings ("Not for structural tags/headers alone — use on-page-seo-checker; not for domain/citation trust — use domain-authority-auditor"), establishing a clear niche with minimal conflict risk.