Conciseness

Mostly efficient — no padding with concepts Claude already knows — but the identity/persistence boundary is restated nearly verbatim in Skill Contract ("never persist the corresponding raw identity or locator"), Creator Feedback ("Persist only the evidence-bound change summary..."), and Persistence ("replace every creator/reviewer/brief name, handle, email..."), and the Contract section is a single dense run-on paragraph. Matches anchor 3 (could be tightened); not 4 because the repetition is substantial rather than minor, and not 2 because nothing explains known concepts.

Actionability

Gives executable specifics: `python3 "$AARON_SKILLS_ROOT/scripts/rubric-score.py" score <run.json>`, the `AARON_SKILLS_ROOT` resolution expression, explicit typed fields to consume (`status`, `verdict`, `score_state`, `raw_overall_score`, `final_overall_score`, `cap_applied`), veto IDs, and four concrete worked examples. Not 5: several referenced paths (auditor-runbook.md, star-benchmark.md, the STAR catalog entry, validate-audit-artifact.py) live outside the bundle and cannot be executed from this skill alone.

Workflow Clarity

The Evidence and Scoring section is a numbered 1–5 sequence, a dedicated Validation Checkpoints checklist exists, and error-recovery loops are present (runtime unavailable → `NOT_SCORED`; validate → persist → revalidate; resubmission conditions per change). Not 5 because the actual execution order is scattered across Skill Contract, Runtime and Setup, Evidence and Scoring, Creator Feedback, and Persistence rather than presented as one coherent flow, and the "Runtime Reads" list vs. "Runtime and Setup" duplication leaves the entry sequence ambiguous.

Progressive Disclosure

Good structure with a Reference Materials section whose local one-level-deep links (references/auditor-runtime.md, quality-review-aids.md, review-templates.md) are real, substantive files; section headers aid navigation. Not 5: the "Runtime Reads" list duplicates Reference Materials, and five links point three levels up (../../../references/) outside the bundle — unverifiable, near-nested indirection; not 3 because the core split (SKILL.md overview + three bundled references) is appropriate and clearly signaled.

Specificity

Enumerates multiple concrete actions — "runs the typed STAR pre-publish gate, scores Trust and Appeal on the deliverable, folds in the creator Suitability read, computes the profile-weighted SQS, checks the disclosure/claim/brand-safety and fraud/fake-engagement vetoes, and writes constructive revision feedback" — with comprehensive coverage of the audit workflow. Not below 4 because coverage of what the skill does is essentially complete; the actions are specific rather than minor-gap.

Completeness

Explicitly answers both: what (the enumerated STAR gate, SQS, vetoes, and feedback actions) and when ("Use when the user asks to..." with two concrete trigger phrases). Also adds negative boundaries ("Not for drafting the brief — use brief-generator"), which strengthens the what/when contract beyond anchor 5's requirements.

Trigger Term Quality

Quotes two natural user phrases ("review this influencer content", "check if this post meets brand guidelines") plus "brand guidelines" and "disclosure", but omits common variations like "sponsored post", "creator content", or "approve this post". Good coverage with a few natural terms missing — anchor 4, not 5 (which requires synonym/extension-level coverage), and clearly above 3's partial keyword set.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear niche (pre-publish influencer content audit with a go/no-go SQS) with distinct triggers, and it explicitly disambiguates adjacent skills ("not for drafting the brief — use brief-generator; not for partnership terms — use contract-helper"), minimizing wrong-skill triggering. Not 4: it doesn't just reduce overlap — it actively routes the nearest conflicts elsewhere.