creator-content-auditor

Use when the user asks to "review this influencer content" or "check if this post meets brand guidelines"; runs the typed STAR pre-publish gate, scores Trust and Appeal on the deliverable, folds in the creator Suitability read, computes the profile-weighted SQS, checks the disclosure/claim/brand-safety and fraud/fake-engagement vetoes, and writes constructive revision feedback. Not for drafting the brief — use brief-generator; not for partnership terms — use contract-helper. 达人内容审核/发布前质检

Quality

80%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./influencer/activate/creator-content-auditor/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A tightly structured, action-oriented auditor skill body with concrete commands, worked examples, and explicit validation/persistence feedback loops. Main weakness is repetition of safety caveats and a few overly dense paragraphs that could be tightened or split.

Suggestions

Consolidate the repeated veto set enumeration (currently restated in Evidence and Scoring, Worked Examples, Guardrails, and Translation) into a single canonical definition referenced elsewhere.

Tighten the long Skill Contract paragraph by splitting reads/writes/done-when into a short list so the identity-boundary rule is stated once rather than re-asserted in Skill Contract, Creator Feedback, and Persistence.

Clarify which reference paths are bundled (references/*) versus external root files (../../../references/*) so standalone-install navigation is unambiguous.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is dense and assumes competence (no basic-concept padding), but the veto set (STAR-S2/S6/T1/T2/T3) and the reference-only identity-boundary warning are each restated across multiple sections and could be consolidated.	3 / 5
Actionability	Provides concrete executable commands — 'python3 "$AARON_SKILLS_ROOT/scripts/rubric-score.py" score <run.json>', env-var resolution, 'validate-audit-artifact.py', and exact scorer fields to consume — with minor gaps (run.json structure deferred to references).	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	Clear sequenced flow (Runtime and Setup → numbered Evidence and Scoring 1–5 → Creator Feedback → Validation Checkpoints → Persistence) with explicit validation and a validate→write→revalidate loop, though some checkpoints are declarative rather than fully integrated retry steps.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Well-signaled one-level-deep references via a Runtime Reads list and a Reference Materials section, with real bundled files in references/; minor gaps from mixing bundled (references/) and external (../../../references/) paths and a dense monolithic Skill Contract paragraph.	4 / 5
	Total	15 / 20 Passed

Description

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A highly specific, well-triggered description that clearly states what the skill does, when to use it, and where its boundaries lie relative to sibling skills. Voice is consistently third-person and free of padding.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists multiple concrete actions — 'runs the typed STAR pre-publish gate', 'scores Trust and Appeal', 'folds in the creator Suitability read', 'computes the profile-weighted SQS', 'checks the disclosure/claim/brand-safety and fraud/fake-engagement vetoes', 'writes constructive revision feedback' — giving comprehensive coverage of capabilities.	5 / 5
Completeness	Explicitly answers both what (the STAR gate, scoring, SQS, vetoes, feedback) and when ('Use when the user asks to...') with concrete trigger phrases, and adds clear out-of-scope boundaries.	5 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Natural user-facing triggers like 'review this influencer content' and 'check if this post meets brand guidelines' plus 'brand guidelines' give good coverage, though a few common synonyms (e.g., 'creator content', 'ad compliance') are absent.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Clear niche (influencer pre-publish audit) with explicit conflict avoidance — 'Not for drafting the brief — use brief-generator; not for partnership terms — use contract-helper' — minimizing wrong-skill triggering.	5 / 5
	Total	19 / 20 Passed

Validation

81%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 13 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
metadata_field	'metadata' should map string keys to string values	Warning
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning
relative_links	Relative link issues: 10 suspicious	Warning

	Total	13 / 16 Passed

Repository: aaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skills
Path: influencer/activate/creator-content-auditor/SKILL.md
Commit: 888dd38

Reviewed: 1 day ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.