Content
73%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body delivers a clear, well-validated diagnostic workflow with concrete commands and explicit stop conditions, and external detail is properly pushed to reference files. Its main costs are repetition — the not-creative-builder/not-auditor boundary is stated about five times — and a placeholder-laden ledger command example.
Suggestions
State the boundary ('does not build creative — use ad-creative-builder; does not score RQS — use ad-account-auditor') once, in the intro or Next Best Skill, and cut the repetitions in step 5, Save Results, and Reference Materials to reclaim tokens.
Replace the placeholder ledger invocation with one complete executable example using sample values (e.g. a real --data JSON payload for a sample ad set) so it is copy-paste ready.
Remove filler lines such as 'Primary next skill: use the Next Best Skill below' and consolidate the mid-step file references into the Reference Materials section.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and substantive, but the boundary disclaimer ('this skill does not build creative / does not score the RQS') is restated roughly five times across the intro, step 5, Save Results, Reference Materials, and Next Best Skill, and 'Primary next skill: use the Next Best Skill below' is pure filler. Not 2: there is no concept-teaching padding — the repetition is one fixable pattern. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives near-copy-ready commands ('python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/connectors/ledger.py" record <ad-set> --source paid --data ...' plus 'ledger.py trend ... --field ctr') and concrete decision rules (CTR decays + frequency rises + reach still growing → Rotate-creative). Not 5: the ledger example carries '...' value placeholders rather than one complete runnable invocation with sample values. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Six ordered steps with explicit validation checkpoints — stop if still in learning phase, verify a CVR drop against the GA4/ecommerce truth set before firing a trigger, Hold when decay is within noise — plus a Decision Gate with stop-and-ask vs continue-silently conditions and 'Done when' criteria. Not 4: checkpoints and error-recovery routing are explicit, and the workflow is read-only so no destructive/batch cap applies. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-signaled one-level-deep references (skill-contract.md, measurement-protocol.md, roas-benchmark.md, scripts/connectors/README.md), each annotated with its purpose in a Reference Materials section and cited where relevant in the steps. Not 5: several references (SECURITY.md, CONNECTORS.md, measurement-protocol.md) are scattered mid-instructions, and no bundle files are present to verify the referenced paths resolve. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |