Conciseness

The body is mostly efficient — no explanations of concepts Claude already knows — but could be meaningfully tightened: the Skill Contract "Writes" bullet is a single ~180-word sentence, and the opaque-ref/identity and separate-authorization rules are restated nearly verbatim in the Skill Contract and again in Steps 2, 4, and 5. It is not a 2 because there is no concept over-explanation or padded filler, only redundancy and over-long sentences.

Actionability

Concrete executable guidance is present — oEmbed endpoint URLs, the exact `python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/connectors/youtube.py" channel @handle` command, `~~` connector placeholders, and per-step template blocks in a real references/templates.md file. It falls short of fully copy-paste-ready coverage because most per-step field formats are deferred to the reference files and the referenced connector script is not part of this bundle.

Workflow Clarity

Six steps are clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints and feedback loops: stop with NEEDS_INPUT when required criteria are missing, screening filters in Step 3, refresh logic in Step 4 (stale/unknown required fields force `triage_state: NEEDS_REFRESH`, `ranking_status: NOT_RANKED`, and `NEEDS_INPUT`), and a "Done when" checklist plus partial-checkpoint rules. This matches the top anchor's explicit-validation, error-recovery pattern rather than the minor-validation-gaps level of 4.

Progressive Disclosure

Structure is good: all three local references (templates.md, platform-vetting.md, creator-dossier.md) exist, contain the content claimed (step fill-in blocks and the worked-example anchor are verifiably in templates.md), and are one level deep, clearly signaled, and summarized in a Reference Materials list. It is not a 5 because dense policy prose (the privacy/identity contract, oEmbed/YouTube connector detail) is inlined in SKILL.md where a reference file could carry it, and several referenced paths (../../../references/skill-contract.md, CONNECTORS.md, scripts/connectors) resolve outside this bundle and cannot be verified.

Specificity

The description lists four concrete, specific actions — "produces a multi-platform candidate pool, per-influencer evidence profiles, authenticity red-flag screening, and a Fit-readiness queue without action ranking" — giving comprehensive coverage of the skill's outputs. It exceeds the minor-gaps level of a 4 because every named capability is a distinct concrete action rather than a generic category.

Completeness

It explicitly answers both questions: what it does (candidate pool, evidence profiles, red-flag screening, readiness queue) and when to use it, with concrete quoted trigger phrases. A clear not-for boundary ("Not for STAR scoring or ranking a known shortlist — use fit-scorer") further sharpens both, matching the top anchor rather than the 'when could be more specific' level of 4.

Trigger Term Quality

Natural trigger phrases are present and quoted ("find influencers", "build an influencer list", "discover creators in [niche]") plus Chinese synonyms ("达人挖掘/找达人/创作者名单"), matching the good-coverage anchor. It falls short of 5 because common variations users would naturally say — e.g. "KOL", "influencer research", "find creators" — are missing, and "Fit-readiness" is internal jargon.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche is clear (influencer/creator discovery from scratch) and the explicit disambiguation "Not for STAR scoring or ranking a known shortlist — use fit-scorer" minimizes overlap with the closely related scoring skill. This is the distinct-triggers, minimal-conflict case rather than the minor-overlap case of 4.