Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, executable auditor runbook with concrete commands, explicit validation checkpoints, and externalized detail in a bundled reference. It respects Claude's competence while remaining actionable. No significant weaknesses to address.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean, information-dense body that assumes Claude's competence — no basic-concept explanations and no padding; every section carries operational load, with veto IDs reinforced only where contextually justified. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Gives concrete executable guidance: env-var resolution, `python3 "$AARON_SKILLS_ROOT/scripts/rubric-score.py" score <run.json>`, exact veto IDs to verify, and `validate-audit-artifact.py` against a specific relative path. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequence (declare profile → score → verify vetoes → report → validation checkpoints → persist) with explicit validate-then-revalidate feedback loops around the destructive persistence step. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Concise overview with a clearly signaled Reference Materials section and one-level-deep references; the heavy typed-framework snapshot is externalized into the bundled references/auditor-runtime.md rather than inlined. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |