Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured instruction skill: a numbered workflow with validation gates, concrete per-step rules, and a clean Reference Materials section that routes depth to one-level-deep files. Minor redundancy between the scope guard and the banned-word steps (2 and 7) is the only tightening opportunity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and purposeful — 'tagline and one-liner derived from the canvas value themes', 'the empty-chair test (would the named ICP reader care about each sentence?)' — assuming Claude's competence with no concept-tutorial padding; only mild redundancy between the scope guard and steps 2/7 keeps it from being perfectly lean. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Gives concrete executable rules — 'Label every proof point Measured (own analytics/export), User-provided, or [needs source]', 'the press release in launch-day tense... numbers over adjectives', 'cite the official App Store Connect / Play Console docs and mark verify current' — instruction-only yet highly actionable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-step sequence with explicit validation checkpoints and feedback loops: 'If canon is absent... request an explicit exploratory fallback or stop', 'Run both against the Output Voice banned-vocabulary list... before presenting', and a 'Done when' checklist — matching the validation-and-recovery anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references (Reference Materials listing ramp-benchmark.md, skill-contract.md, and sibling skills with one-line purposes); no nested chains, and no bundle files are present requiring deeper structure. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |