Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill body is a lean, well-sequenced instruction document: concrete routing rules, explicit validation checkpoints, one-level-deep references, and a tight scope guard. It adds only what is non-obvious and leaves asset construction to named owners.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense and lean with no concept-explanation padding (no 'what a launch is' filler); each sentence carries routing rules, scope guards, or handoffs, so every token earns its place. Not score 2 because there is no removable explanation of things Claude already knows. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable guidance: tier routing (major = full-channel / medium = targeted / minor = changelog-only), named handoff targets, and concrete commands ('operation: propose' request to registry-events.py, claims to memory/events/claims.ndjson, 'mark the spacing check NEEDS_INPUT'). Not score 2 because the direction is specific and copy-ready rather than pseudocode-level. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 9-step sequence with explicit validation checkpoints — NEEDS_INPUT when no calendar record exists, a dedicated claims-hygiene step, and a 'Done when' checklist — plus an 'ask rather than assuming' feedback loop. Not score 2 because checkpoints and error-recovery are explicit, not implicit. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview pointing one level deep to well-signaled references (ramp-benchmark.md, CONNECTORS.md, SECURITY.md, skill-contract.md) with clearly labeled sections for easy navigation; no nested indirection. Not score 2 because references are clearly signaled and content is appropriately split rather than inlined. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |