Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is lean, well-sequenced, and includes real validation feedback loops, scoring high on conciseness and workflow clarity. It is held back by a non-executable Quick Start and by reference links that resolve to files absent from the bundle.
Suggestions
Replace the prose-only Quick Start with at least one concrete, runnable invocation example (e.g., the exact command/argument pattern that triggers a typed profile).
Resolve the Reference Materials links against the bundle: either bundle auditor-runbook.md, scoring-semantics.md, tale-benchmark.md, and measurement-protocol.md, or mark which are root-only versus standalone-bundled.
Clarify in the Runtime section which referenced runbooks ship with a standalone install versus requiring the repository/plugin root, so the fail-closed path is unambiguous.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and assumes Claude's competence — it does not explain what narrative auditing or scoring is, and defers detail to references rather than padding the overview. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Procedure, vetoes, report format, and persistence steps are concrete, but the Quick Start is prose rather than executable commands and the runnable scorer plus most referenced runbooks are not present in the bundle. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear Setup → Profile Procedure → Report → Validation Checkpoints → Persistence sequence exists, with an explicit validate→Write→revalidate feedback loop and a checkpoints checklist for the fragile persist step. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well organized and point one level deep to references, but the Reference Materials list cites four files (auditor-runbook, scoring-semantics, tale-benchmark, measurement-protocol) that are not present in the bundled references/ directory. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |