Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-architected router skill: the bundle split is exemplary (lean overview plus four verified, clearly-signaled play packs), routing rules are unambiguous with hard input gates, and batch/destructive channels are dry-run-by-default and guardrail-gated. The main cost is redundancy — mode lists, scope exclusions, and next-skill routing are each stated two to four times across sections, inflating the body without adding information.
Suggestions
Merge the "Scope guard" paragraph and the intro scope sentence into one exclusions list; they name the same four sibling skills (keyword-research, content-gap-analysis, content-writer, content-quality-auditor) within 60 lines of each other.
Keep only one next-skill routing map: the mode-conditional "Next Best Skill" section restates the "Primary next skill" lines from the Skill Contract — replace the Skill Contract entry with a pointer to the Next Best Skill section.
Move the per-mode `~~` connector column of the Data Sources table into the corresponding play pack (or CONNECTORS.md), keeping only the shared Measured/User-provided/Estimated provenance rule in the body.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | No background-concept padding, but the body restates the same information repeatedly: the four modes are enumerated in the intro, Quick Start, Mode Selector table, Instructions, Scope guard, and Next Best Skill; the scope exclusions appear in the intro, the Scope guard paragraph, and Next Best Skill; and the "Primary next skill" map in the Skill Contract duplicates the mode-conditional branches in Next Best Skill verbatim. This fits the 3 anchor (mostly efficient but could be tightened); it is not a 2 because each repetition carries routing detail rather than explanation of known concepts, and not a 4 because consolidating 2–3 sections would remove a substantial fraction of the body. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance throughout: a mode table with trigger phrasing and hard REQUIRED-input gates (NEEDS_INPUT), exact output filenames ("YYYY-MM-DD-<pattern>-pseo-plan.md"), a real runnable command ("python3 \"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/connectors/indexpush.py\" indexnow --file new-urls.txt --key $INDEXNOW_KEY"), and per-mode guardrail checks. Mostly-executable matches the 4 anchor; it is not a 5 because the actual page-build steps are deferred to the play packs, so the body alone covers routing and gating but not the core build mechanics. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The five numbered instructions give a clear sequence with real validation checkpoints: stop-and-ask on ambiguity, NEEDS_INPUT halt on missing or inconsistent input, guardrail applied before handoff ("Flag any blocker; do not ship it silently"), and the batch index-push channel dry-run by default and gated ("push only after the thin/duplicate guardrail passes") — so the batch-operation validation cap is satisfied. It falls short of the 5 anchor because the in-body error-recovery loop is thin: what to do when a guardrail fails (the P0/P1/P2 remediation ladder) is only referenced, not stated as a fix-and-recheck step. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Textbook router structure, verified against the bundle: a ~100-line overview whose bulk content lives in four one-level-deep play packs (references/programmatic.md, parasite.md, comparison.md, local.md — all present, each 72–105 lines, each matching its Reference Materials annotation and linking back to ../SKILL.md). Reference Materials signals each file with a description of its contents; the only second-hop links (parasite.md → repo-shared references/platforms/*.md, SECURITY.md, CONNECTORS.md) are shared repo assets surfaced only after loading the pack, which preserves one-level navigation within the skill. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |