Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, largely actionable instruction-only skill with a clear 8-step workflow, explicit boundaries, and good reference signaling. Its main costs are token redundancy (the sole-writer and propose-request caveats repeated across sections), unverifiable external reference paths in the absence of any bundle files, and no example artifacts (ledger row, cadence block) that would make the output spec copy-paste concrete.
Suggestions
State the "channel-registry is the sole writer / operation: propose via registry-events.py" guardrail once (e.g., in the Skill Contract) and reference it from the other sections — the current four-fold repetition costs tokens on every load.
Add one concrete example artifact — a filled-in ledger row and a sample weekly cadence block — to lift actionability from mostly-executable to copy-paste ready.
Verify the referenced bundle paths (../../../references/*.md, CONNECTORS.md, SECURITY.md) ship with the skill, or move that content into a local references/ directory, since none of the referenced files currently resolve inside the skill bundle.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and mostly avoids explaining known concepts, but it repeats the same guardrails many times — "[channel-registry] is the sole writer of memory/channels/" appears in four sections and the "authorized operation: propose request to registry-events.py" phrasing in three — and inlines internal jargon (ECHO E2/E3/E6/E10 sub-item wiring) that earns back little guidance value. This is more than the minor trimming of the anchor-4 case, fitting the could-be-tightened anchor at 3. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | For an instruction-only skill the guidance is largely concrete: ledger columns "date, community, give/ask, link, note", testable example graduation criteria ("≥N weeks tenure… zero rule strikes, and a first non-promotional post accepted without moderator action"), named connector scripts, and an explicit NEEDS_INPUT stop. Minor gaps (no example ledger row, no sample cadence block sizing) keep it below the fully-copy-paste-ready anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Eight clearly numbered steps in a coherent sequence with an input-validation checkpoint (step 1 stops with NEEDS_INPUT and routes upstream) and a "Done when" checklist. No validate→fix→retry feedback loop is specified, which is the gap that separates anchor 4 from anchor 5; the destructive/batch cap does not apply since this is a planning skill, not a batch/destructive operation. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure is good — a clean overview, a Skill Contract, an annotated Reference Materials list with one-level-deep links each carrying a one-line purpose, and a Next Best Skill routing section. However no bundle files (references/, scripts/, assets/) ship with the skill: every referenced path (echo-benchmark.md, owned-community-loop.md, skill-contract.md, CONNECTORS.md, SECURITY.md, sibling SKILL.md files) resolves outside the skill directory and cannot be verified, and substantial cross-skill wiring is inlined rather than split out — the minor-organization-gaps anchor at 4 rather than the clean split of anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |