Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-sequenced instruction skill with explicit validation gates and cleanly signaled references. It balances conciseness with actionable specificity throughout.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — it never explains what brand-safety or exclusions are, and every section earns its tokens. Minor redundancy between the 'Scope guard' and step 6's negative scope is not enough to drop below the lean-and-efficient anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete numbered steps, specific save paths (memory/ad/placement-exclusion-manager/YYYY-MM-DD-...), explicit connectors (~~ad platform), and a clear Reads/Writes/Done-when contract give fully actionable guidance; absence of executable code is unpenalized for an instruction-only skill per the rubric. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 7-step sequence has explicit validation checkpoints (mark A1 evidence Unknown, stop with NEEDS_INPUT, 'do not infer a safe list'), a Done-when gate, and a scope guard — matching the anchor for clear sequence with explicit validation and feedback loops. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is organized into well-signaled sections with one-level-deep references to real reference docs (roas-benchmark.md, CONNECTORS.md, SECURITY.md, skill-contract.md); no bundle directories exist but the SKILL.md stays an overview pointing outward rather than inlining detail. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |