Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A thorough, well-sequenced instruction skill with strong workflow checkpoints and clean one-level-deep referencing. Its main liability is repetition of the same scope-boundary language across multiple sections, which inflates token cost without adding clarity.
Suggestions
State the email-sequence-designer / consent-registry / email-quality-auditor boundary once in the Scope Guard and reference it from elsewhere instead of restating it verbatim in the Skill Contract, Instructions steps 6–7, Reference Materials, and Next Best Skill.
Inline a compact version of the handoff/save-results output shape (from skill-contract.md) so Claude can produce the deliverable without a follow-up file read.
Trim the trailing CJK tag ('邮件偏好中心/降频阶梯设计/退订替代降档') from the description — it duplicates the displayName/summary and adds tokens that do not aid triggering.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient domain-specific content, but the scope boundaries (the email-sequence-designer / consent-registry / auditor division) are restated nearly verbatim in the Skill Contract, Instructions steps 6–7, the Scope Guard paragraph, Reference Materials, and Next Best Skill — material that could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, specific guidance throughout: example topic groups, a cadence-tier ladder (weekly → monthly → quarterly → pause 90 days), an ordered opt-down path, and copy-paste-style mapping rules ('topic X → suppress topic-X stream; monthly tier → cap sends to 1/month'). It is instruction-only, so the absence of code is not penalized; the gap is that the actual handoff/save output format is delegated to an external template not shown inline. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Eight explicitly numbered steps with a 'Done when' completion checklist, 'Decision Gates' (stop-and-ask vs. continue-silently), data-provenance labeling (Measured/User-provided/Estimated), and a feedback loop in the termination note (auditor returns BLOCK on N1 → route back to repair the opt-down path). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections (Quick Start, Skill Contract, Data Sources, Instructions, Decision Gates, Save Results, Reference Materials, Next Best Skill) with clearly signaled, one-level-deep references to sibling skills and shared docs ([send-benchmark.md], [skill-contract.md], [CONNECTORS.md], [SECURITY.md]); no nested reference chains. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |