Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, domain-specific instruction skill with a clear contract, concrete heuristics, and a done-when checklist. Its main weakness is token efficiency: routing and scope boilerplate is duplicated across nearly every section, and the referenced detailed materials are not present in the skill's own bundle.
Suggestions
State the claim/term routing rule once in the Skill Contract (e.g., a short 'all claims go to memory/events/claims.ndjson via an authorized operation: propose request to registry-events.py') and refer to it from steps 4-8 instead of repeating the full phrasing five times.
Deduplicate the registry-handoff and scope statements across Scope guard, Instructions step 8, Save Results, Reference Materials, and Next Best Skill — the same three sibling-skill exclusions and routing rules appear in at least four sections.
Show one concrete example of the registry-events.py propose invocation (or a one-line pointer to where its usage is documented) so the routing step is executable rather than implied.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body assumes Claude's competence and explains no known concepts, but the phrase "via an authorized `operation: propose` request to `registry-events.py`" is repeated nearly verbatim more than five times, and the registry-routing and scope rules are restated across the Scope guard, Skill Contract, Instructions 4/5/6/8, Save Results, and Next Best Skill sections — noticeably more tightening needed than the "minor instances" of the 4 anchor. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and executable for an instruction-only skill: specific heuristics ("3-tier ladder at roughly 1x / 2.2x / 5x price points", "DIY / Done-With-You / Done-For-You" naming), explicit memory paths, labeling rules, and Quick Start prompts. Minor gap: the actual invocation of `registry-events.py` is referenced but never shown. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Eight numbered steps are clearly sequenced with validation prompts ("Validate either heuristic against the user's actual cost and value structure", "Flag any pillar with no home") and a "Done when" checklist acting as an exit gate. It falls short of the 5 anchor because there is no explicit error-recovery feedback loop, though the operations here are candidate proposals rather than destructive writes. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-sectioned overview (Quick Start, Skill Contract, Data Sources, Instructions, Save Results, Reference Materials, Next Best Skill) with annotated, one-level-deep links. However, no bundle files (references/, scripts/, assets/) exist to hold the detail — templates like skill-contract.md's Handoff/Save formats and the registry-events.py usage live outside the skill and cannot be verified — and the registry-routing content repeated inline is material that belongs in one referenced place. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |