CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

pricing-packaging-planner

Use when the user asks to "plan launch pricing", "design pricing tiers / packaging", or "set up a launch discount / early-bird offer"; produces a launch pricing and packaging plan — tier structure and naming, a value-to-price map aligned to the message house, a launch-offer ladder with a true deadline reason, beta / early-adopter pricing with a post-launch graduation path, and guarantee / refund terms — with every price claim and offer term submitted to memory/events/claims.ndjson. Not for the canonical offer / claim record — use offer-claims-registry; not for paid-newsletter subscription economics — use newsletter-monetization-planner; not for ad bidding — use bid-strategy-planner. 发布定价/梯度打包/早鸟优惠/保证设计

64

Quality

80%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./launch/assemble/pricing-packaging-planner/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, actionable instruction-only skill body with clear sequencing and good reference hygiene. Its main weakness is conciseness: repeated registry-routing boilerplate and dense compound sentences could be trimmed without losing meaning.

Suggestions

Collapse the repeated 'via an authorized operation: propose request to registry-events.py' into a single defined shorthand (e.g., 'submit a propose event to registry-events.py — see Step 8') referenced from each step instead of restated in full.

Shorten the long compound sentences in the Scope guard and Step 4 into shorter, parallel statements so the rules (no fake scarcity, no blind ratios) read as a checklist.

Add one short inline example of the propose-event payload shape for claims.ndjson so the routing step is fully executable rather than only described.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but is noticeably verbose: the boilerplate 'via an authorized operation: propose request to registry-events.py' is repeated four times, and long compound sentences with heavy cross-referencing could be tightened.

3 / 5

Actionability

Concrete numbered steps with specific heuristics (3-tier 1x/2.2x/5x, DIY/DWY/DFY naming), explicit file paths (claims.ndjson), and clear don'ts (no fake scarcity, no blind ratios) give mostly executable guidance; minor gaps remain because the propose-operation format is referenced but not shown inline.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear 8-step sequence with an explicit 'Done when' checklist and validation-style checkpoints (flag orphaned pillars, mark unsubstantiated claims '[needs source]', ask before writing); the registry-formalizes step acts as the validation gate, though there is no explicit post-routing verification step.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized into clear sections (Quick Start, Skill Contract, Data Sources, Instructions, Reference Materials) with clearly signaled one-level-deep references; no bundle files exist, and inline references point cleanly to the broader repo rather than nesting.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A high-quality description: concrete capabilities, verbatim natural trigger phrases, explicit when-guidance, and clear disambiguation from neighboring skills. The only minor gap is a few missing natural synonyms for the trigger terms.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — 'tier structure and naming', 'value-to-price map', 'launch-offer ladder with a true deadline reason', 'beta / early-adopter pricing with a post-launch graduation path', and 'guarantee / refund terms' plus submission to claims.ndjson — giving comprehensive coverage of what the skill does.

5 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both 'what' (produces a launch pricing/packaging plan with named components) and 'when' (an explicit 'Use when the user asks to...' clause with concrete trigger phrases).

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Quoted natural trigger phrases — 'plan launch pricing', 'design pricing tiers / packaging', 'set up a launch discount / early-bird offer' — are phrases a user would naturally say, though a few common synonyms/variations are absent, keeping it just below the comprehensive anchor.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear niche — launch pricing/packaging — with explicit 'Not for... use offer-claims-registry / newsletter-monetization-planner / bid-strategy-planner' disambiguation, minimizing conflict risk with sibling skills.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Validation

75%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation12 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_field

'metadata' should map string keys to string values

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

relative_links

Relative link issues: 27 suspicious

Warning

referenced_paths_exist

Referenced path issues: 1 missing, 1 deeper-than-1-level

Warning

Total

12

/

16

Passed

Repository
aaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.