Content
73%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured instruction skill: an explicit contract, a validated 8-step workflow with a quality-bar checklist, and a real, well-organized one-level-deep reference file. The main costs are repetition of scope/ROAS framing across four sections and a tangle of out-of-bundle cross-references that dilute the lean core.
Suggestions
State the scope boundaries (not ad-creative-builder, not ad-account-auditor, not landing-optimizer) once — in the Scope guard — and drop the repeats from the intro, Skill Contract, and Next Best Skill to reclaim tokens.
Replace step 3's inline attribute enumeration with a pointer to the attribute-priority checklist in references/feed-title-patterns.md, keeping only the required-attribute names inline, to remove duplication.
Consolidate the out-of-bundle ../../../ links (skill-contract, CONNECTORS, SECURITY, humanizer-slop, roas-benchmark) into the Reference Materials section so the instruction steps stay focused on the feed work itself.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is domain-specific with no basic-concept padding, but the ROAS O(Offer) framing and the 'not ad-creative-builder / not ad-account-auditor' scope disclaimers each repeat three to four times (intro, Skill Contract, Scope guard, Reference Materials, Next Best Skill). That is more than 'minor instances of over-explanation', fitting 'mostly efficient but could be tightened'. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Steps 1–8 give concrete executable guidance — named required/recommended attributes, hygiene rules keyed to landing-page truth, an explicit save path, and a NEEDS_INPUT path. Not 5 because the worked patterns (per-platform character limits, title formulas, before/after examples) live only in the reference file with no inline quick example. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Eight clearly sequenced steps with ordering rationale ('Triage disapprovals first... a rewritten title on a disapproved item still does not serve'), validation embedded in steps 5–6 (price/availability reconciliation, claim pre-check), an explicit five-point Quality-bar checklist with a fix-or-report feedback loop ('If any item fails, fix it or report it in the handoff — do not ship silently'), and 'Done when' criteria. This matches the anchor with explicit validation, error recovery, and a checklist. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The bundle reference (references/feed-title-patterns.md) exists, is one level deep, and is clearly signaled both in step 4 and in the Reference Materials section with a description. Not 5 because step 3's required/recommended attribute list duplicates the reference's checklist inline, and the body is threaded with many out-of-bundle ../../../ links (skill-contract.md, CONNECTORS.md, SECURITY.md, humanizer-slop.md, other skills) that add navigation load without being part of the bundle. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |