Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable reporting skill with a clear sequenced workflow, explicit missing-artifact fallbacks, and appropriate offloading of templates to a real reference file. Its main weakness is verbosity from repeated authorization/ref-handling prose that could be consolidated.
Suggestions
Consolidate the repeated opaque-ref / WARM-save / authorization rules (currently restated in the Skill Contract, step 2, step 6, and Done-when #5) into a single stated-once section to reduce token weight while preserving the safeguards.
Add an explicit validate→fix→retry checkpoint for the save/distribute path (e.g., re-confirm artifact refs and audience authorization before persistence) to lift workflow clarity above its current checkpoint level.
Consider moving the dense Skill Contract policy block into a referenced contract file so the SKILL.md body stays a lean overview, improving both conciseness and progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and free of basic-concept padding, but the Skill Contract and step 6 repeat the opaque-ref / WARM-save / authorization rules at length several times across sections; this safety prose could be tightened or consolidated without losing the safeguards. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete 7-step procedure, a worked report excerpt with a real markdown table, and specific guidance on pairing metrics with source-dated context; minor gaps remain because much of the actionable detail (full templates, charts) lives in the referenced file rather than inline. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-step sequence with explicit fallback checkpoints (return a partial shell plus NEEDS_INPUT when an artifact is absent; emit a bound decision: unknown placeholder when the Retro Card is missing/mismatched) and a "Done when" checklist, but it lacks a formal validate→fix→retry feedback loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good structure with well-signaled one-level-deep references to the real bundle file references/report-templates.md and a clear Reference Materials index; the dense inline Skill Contract / authorization policy is arguably content that could be factored into a reference, leaving minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |