Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable with explicit formulas, a worked example, and a well-sequenced workflow with done-when checkpoints and one-level-deep references. Its only weakness is moderate verbosity in the STAR evidence machinery.
Suggestions
Tighten step 9's R1–R6 enumeration and the cross-discipline paid-ads note; link the STAR detail to star-benchmark.md instead of restating it inline.
Consider moving the lengthy reference-material link list into a short 'Related skills' subsection to reduce visual weight in the main flow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is information-dense and avoids explaining basics Claude knows, but the STAR Return (R) evidence section (R1–R6 enumeration) and the cross-discipline paid-ads note add length that could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Gives concrete, copy-paste-ready formulas (Simple ROI, ROAS, EMV = Impressions × CPM / 1000, LTV-Based ROI) and a fully worked numeric example, plus per-step templates. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 10-step sequence is reinforced by a Skill Contract with explicit 'Done when' checkpoints, reads/writes/promotes boundaries, and a termination/hop-limit rule. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | SKILL.md is an overview that links one level deep to the verified references/roi-templates.md for templates, with cross-skill pointers clearly signaled rather than nested. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |