Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, mostly lean instruction skill with concrete numbered steps, an explicit validation checkpoint, and clear cross-skill handoffs. Slight redundancy and the absence of a retry feedback loop are the main room-for-improvement areas.
Suggestions
Collapse the overlap between the intro paragraph, the Skill Contract 'Expected output' line, and the 'Scope guard' so each piece of guidance appears once.
Add an explicit validate→fix→retry loop for the batch negate/harvest step (e.g., re-check match-type and cost-floor decisions before emitting the diff).
State default values or ranges for the harvest threshold and waste cost floor, even as recommended starting points, so the guidance is copy-paste ready rather than left to the user.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and assumes Claude's competence — no padded explanations of ROAS or n-grams — with minor redundancy between the intro paragraph, the 'Expected output' contract, and the scope guard. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete instruction-style guidance (tokenize into 1-/2-/3-grams, state the cost floor, assign exact/phrase match type at ad-group/campaign/shared-list level, label Measured/User-provided/Estimated) with only minor gaps around explicit thresholds. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 7-step sequence with a validation checkpoint ('If the conversion column is missing, stop and ask') and a 'Done when' checklist for the batch/negation operations; missing a full validate→fix→retry feedback loop keeps it just below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections with one-level-deep references collected in a 'Reference Materials' block; no bundle files exist, and most referenced material lives in sibling skills, so navigation is clear but not perfectly self-contained. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |