Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, jargon-fluent auditor runbook with concrete declared fields, named veto IDs, explicit validation checkpoints, and a well-structured reference layout. It is strong across all dimensions with only minor tightening and reference-clarity gains available.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense and assumes Claude's competence — uses ECHO IDs, typed artifacts, and vetoes without over-explaining basics — but a few sentences (e.g., the Runtime and Setup paragraph) are jargon-packed and could be tightened. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives concrete, executable guidance — specific declared fields (assessment_mode, program_archetype, channels, market, window), named veto IDs (ECHO-E1/C1/C2/H1/H2/O1), a concrete env-var resolution, and a named validator script — with minor gaps since core scoring mechanics live in external references. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequenced flow (declare target/profile → profile procedure → verify vetoes → run scorer → report → validation checkpoints → persist) with explicit validation checkpoints and a validate/Write/revalidate loop; not a strict numbered checklist, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections with clearly signaled one-level-deep references (Runtime Reads list, Reference Materials links) and a bundled references/auditor-runtime.md that exists; several ../../../references paths are external to this bundle, a minor organization gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |