Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable instruction skill with a clear sequenced workflow and strong cross-skill navigation. The main weakness is verbosity from repeating the propose-to-registry-events guardrail verbatim across several sections rather than stating it once.
Suggestions
State the 'unbacked proof / canon element → authorized operation: propose to registry-events.py' rule once in the Skill Contract and reference it from Instructions and Save Results instead of repeating the full clause each time, to reclaim several hundred tokens.
Add a short validate→fix→retry checkpoint after the proof-gap flagging step (e.g., 're-tag or drop until every pillar has a Measured or ledger-approved proof, else surface as an E-dimension risk') to lift workflow_clarity.
Consolidate the duplicated scope-guard exclusions (frontmatter description vs. body Scope guard vs. Skill Contract Reads) into one canonical list to reduce redundancy.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and assumes Claude's competence (no basic-concept padding), but the boilerplate clause 'via an authorized `operation: propose` request to `registry-events.py`' recurs ~6 times across the intro, Skill Contract, Instructions, and Save Results, and could be tightened via a single stated rule. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete and executable: specific paths (memory/narrative/story-bank-builder/), files (claims.ndjson, narrative.ndjson, claims-ledger.md), scripts (registry-events.py, firecrawl.py), proof labels, and an arc beat template (situation → tension → change → outcome); minor gaps only because it is instruction-only with no runnable code (justified for this skill type). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-step sequence with explicit checkpoints — 'stop with NEEDS_INPUT' when pillars are missing, 'keep it out of the bank until the tension is real', drop-orphan-or-note, and a 'Done when' checklist — though validation is gating rather than a validate→fix→retry loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into Quick Start, Skill Contract, Data Sources, Instructions, Save Results, Reference Materials, and Next Best Skill, with one-level-deep cross-skill references clearly signaled in the Reference Materials list; no bundle files exist under ./references, ./scripts, or ./assets to verify, so structure (not bundle paths) drives the score. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |