Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable instruction skill with clear sequencing and one-level-deep references. Its main weaknesses are repetition (the registry-events.py handoff phrase and the exclusion list recur across sections) and the absence of an explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop for its batch memory-write operations.
Suggestions
Define the 'authorized `operation: propose` request to `registry-events.py`' handoff once (e.g. in a short 'Proof & canon handoff' subsection) and reference it by name elsewhere, instead of repeating the full phrase in the Skill Contract, Instructions, and Save Results sections.
Consolidate the sibling-skill exclusions into the single Scope guard block and drop their re-listing in Reference Materials / Next Best Skill where they duplicate, keeping only the navigation pointer.
Add an explicit validation feedback loop for the batch write step — e.g. after assembling the bank, re-check that every story maps to exactly one pillar and every proof carries a label, and if any fail, fix and re-verify before saving — to lift workflow clarity above 2.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is operational and assumes Claude's competence (no 'what is a story' padding), but repeats 'via an authorized `operation: propose` request to `registry-events.py`' verbatim ~6 times and restates the same sibling-skill exclusion list across the description, Scope guard, and Reference Materials. This fits 'mostly efficient but could be tightened', short of the lean score-3 anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance throughout: exact memory paths (memory/narrative/story-bank-builder/), proof labels (Measured / User-provided / [needs source]), five named story types, and an arc beat sequence (situation → tension → change → outcome). Meets the score-3 'concrete, specific guidance' bar for an instruction-only skill. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-step Instructions sequence with a NEEDS_INPUT stop (step 1), proof-gap flagging (step 6), and a 'Done when' checklist. However, for batch story processing and memory writes there is no explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop, which the rubric expects for destructive/batch operations, capping it at 2 rather than 3. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview that points one level deep to clearly signaled references (tale-benchmark.md, skill-contract.md, CONNECTORS.md, SECURITY.md, and sibling SKILL.md files), collected in a Reference Materials section. No bundle files exist under ./references, ./scripts, or ./assets, so there is no nested-reference problem; organization matches the score-3 anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |