CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

gitnexus-debugging

Use when the user is debugging a bug, tracing an error, or asking why something fails. Examples: "Why is X failing?", "Where does this error come from?", "Trace this bug"

66

Quality

79%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./gitnexus-cursor-integration/skills/gitnexus-debugging/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, highly actionable debugging skill with a clear workflow, concrete tool examples, and built-in validation; the only room for improvement is trimming minor prose and considering whether the tool reference belongs in a separate file.

Suggestions

Tighten the 'Bind the repository first' paragraph (e.g. fold the silent-default MCP-policy detail into a one-line caveat) to lift conciseness toward 5.

If the Tools section grows, move the per-tool detailed examples into a references/ file and keep SKILL.md as a one-level-deep overview.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Lean body that avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows; the repo-binding prose is a justified GitNexus-specific gotcha but is slightly more elaborate than necessary.

4 / 5

Actionability

Copy-paste-ready tool calls with arguments and realistic outputs (query, context, cypher, trace) cover the common debugging cases concretely and executably.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear numbered 0–4 sequence is reinforced by a checklist and an explicit staleness validation step with a re-analyze feedback loop; the skill is read-only so no destructive-operation cap applies.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist and the body is well-organized into clearly signaled sections with all content appropriately inline, but at over 50 lines it does not qualify for the simple-skill full marks.

4 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A concise, third-person description with explicit 'Use when' triggers and natural example phrases; its main weakness is a thin 'what' that names the debugging domain without enumerating the skill's concrete capabilities.

Suggestions

Add one clause naming the concrete capabilities the skill brings (e.g. 'Traces root causes across an indexed codebase via call-chain queries and execution-flow analysis') to strengthen specificity and completeness.

Mention GitNexus or 'indexed repository' in the description to sharpen distinctiveness and reduce conflict with generic debugging skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the debugging domain with one or two concrete actions ('debugging a bug, tracing an error'), but does not enumerate the underlying capabilities (e.g. querying error text, tracing call chains) that the skill actually performs.

3 / 5

Completeness

Both 'what' (debugging/tracing errors) and 'when' (explicit 'Use when...' with concrete trigger examples) are answered, but the 'what' is thinner than the 'when' and could be more specific.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural user phrasings are present and exemplified ('Why is X failing?', 'Where does this error come from?', 'Trace this bug'), giving good keyword coverage, though a few common synonyms are absent.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The debugging/tracing niche is mostly distinct and the trigger phrases are specific, though the description does not name GitNexus, leaving minor overlap risk with general coding skills.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
abhigyanpatwari/GitNexus
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.