Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A focused, well-structured debugging skill with concrete executable tool calls and a clear sequenced workflow plus checklist. Minor redundancy and the absence of an explicit validation loop are the only thing keeping it from top marks.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient with no padding about what a knowledge graph or call chain is; minor redundancy between the Debugging Patterns table and the Tools section (query/context appear in both) keeps it just below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully concrete, copy-paste-ready tool calls with realistic values (`query({search_query: "payment validation error"})`, `trace({ from: "processCheckout", to: "fetchRates" })`) cover the common debugging cases; the Tools section backs the templated workflow with complete executable examples. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 4-step numbered workflow with a purpose-annotating arrow per step, a checklist, and a stale-index recovery tip ('If Index is stale -> run node .gitnexus/run.cjs analyze'); it lacks an explicit validate->fix->retry loop, though the read-only nature means that cap does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized single-file skill (When to Use, Workflow, Checklist, Debugging Patterns, Tools, Example) with no bundle files needing references; at ~95 lines it is slightly over the under-50 simple-skill threshold, so it sits just below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |