Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, highly actionable reference: concrete tool calls, exact resource URIs, a staleness recovery step, and a fully worked example, with clean section organization and no wasted tokens.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: it gives only operational steps, URIs, and a worked example with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows, matching the "lean and efficient; every token earns its place" anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is fully executable with concrete `query({search_query})`, `context({name})` calls, exact `gitnexus://...` resource URIs, and a copy-paste-ready worked example covering the common "how does payment processing work" case. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 5-step numbered sequence with staleness handling ("If step 2 says 'Index is stale' → run `node .gitnexus/run.cjs analyze`") and a checklist is present; checkpoints are slightly implicit since the task is read-only exploration rather than destructive/batch work, keeping it just below the explicit-validation anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a compact (<50 line) read-only skill needing no external references, and it is well-organized into When/Workflow/Checklist/Resources/Tools/Example sections, which the rubric explicitly allows to score 5 with well-organized sections and no bundle dependencies. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |