Content
96%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Excellent orchestrator body: lean, unambiguous lane sequencing with a blocking gate, explicit feedback loops, and precise delegation rules that avoid duplicating the underlying skills' logic. The only weakness is one dangling reference to a README that is neither pathed nor present in the bundle.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — every paragraph encodes a non-inferable behavioral rule ("never inline a summary of what the skill would have done", "Never auto-proceed to execution") with no concept explanations or padding. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully concrete instructions for an instruction-only skill: named skill invocations per lane, the exact fields of the gate summary, the blocking tool ("AskUserQuestion in Claude Code; a numbered list in chat on CLIs without a blocking tool"), headless-run behavior, and size-based routing rules for findings. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Four clearly sequenced lanes with an explicit blocking validation checkpoint and feedback loops: structural drift routes back through a Deepen pass to the gate, and findings trigger one fix-and-re-review cycle with a stated stop condition. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A well-organized single-file overview that is appropriately structured for a thin orchestrator, but "Its re-evaluation governance lives in this skill's README" is an unsignaled external reference with no path and no corresponding bundle file, and the body exceeds the under-50-line simple-skill case. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |