Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an efficient, fully actionable reference: compact routing rules, copy-paste tool calls, sequenced workflows with verification and retry checkpoints, and clean section organization with no wasted tokens or unnecessary external references.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean: it never explains what Google Workspace, email, or calendars are, uses a compact routing table, and gives terse code blocks — every section earns its place, matching the 'lean and efficient; assumes Claude's competence' anchor rather than the 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' level below. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Guidance is copy-paste ready with exact tool syntax like `google_gmail(command: "send --to 'bob@example.com' --subject 'Hi' --body 'Hello!'", account: "Work")`, a concrete read/write routing table, and specific error remediation, matching the 'fully executable code/commands; copy-paste ready' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Multi-step workflows are sequenced with explicit checkpoints: 'Read the email first to see which account received it, then reply from that same account', 'Always confirm with the user which account to send from before calling', and an error feedback loop ('Update the account parameter and retry'), satisfying the 'clear sequence with explicit validation steps; feedback loops for error recovery' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No references/, scripts/, or assets/ bundles exist and the self-contained body is under ~75 lines with well-organized sections (Overview, Routing Rules, Workflows, Error Cases); per the simple-skills scoring note this earns 3 from clear organization alone, and there are no nested or broken references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |