Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, highly actionable body with executable tool signatures, a copy-paste-ready code example, and well-organized sections. The only minor gap is the absence of explicit validation/error-recovery loops, which is acceptable given the non-destructive nature of the operations.
Suggestions
Add a brief verification step to the goal-creation workflow (e.g., confirm the returned goal_id is non-empty / re-search to confirm it appears) to reach full workflow-clarity.
Consider extracting the parked-task capture template into a small reference snippet if the skill grows, to keep the main workflow section scannable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence with no concept-explaining fluff; the few parenthetical asides earn their place by stating real OpenClaw constraints rather than padding. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides exact tool signatures with return values, a copy-paste-ready code example with real string interpolation and parameter shapes, and specific path conventions like 'memory/goal/<owner>/opened/<goal_id>.md'. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Multiple workflows are clearly sequenced with a 'Confirm to the user with the goal_id' checkpoint, but there are no explicit validation/error-recovery feedback loops (acceptable for non-destructive goal creation, so it sits just below 5). | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | At ~50 lines with no need for external references, the body is well-organized into clearly signaled one-level sections (Tools, Workflow, Capture, Resume, What NOT to do) with easy navigation. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |