Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Tight, concrete, and well-structured: it assumes Claude's competence, gives fully executable tool calls and a resumable-context template, and organizes everything into clear sections without unnecessary external references. No meaningful weaknesses to address.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and action-dense with no re-explanation of concepts Claude knows; the few parenthetical asides (provenance flag, no status-move tools) earn their place by preventing wrong actions rather than padding. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Gives exact tool signatures with parameters and return values (e.g. hivemind_goal_add({ text }) returns goal_id), concrete path templates, and a copy-paste-ready "Start here / Files / Branch / Run / Why" example block. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Two clearly numbered, sequenced workflows (goal creation, task resume) with a confirm step and a "What NOT to do" guardrail; the operations are non-destructive so missing validation loops does not cap the score. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A short, single-file skill well-organized into clear sections (Tools, Workflow, Capture, Resume, What NOT to do) with no need for external references; per the simple-skill note this earns a 3. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |