Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured instruction-only skill: concrete heuristics, a memorable verification test, and clean organization with no padding beyond a slightly rhetorical Why paragraph. Adding a brief before/after code example would close the last actionability gap.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes competence, but the 'Why' paragraph spends tokens on truisms ('Code is read far more than it is written') that could be trimmed — minor over-explanation, not the fully lean top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable heuristics are given — 'prefer pure functions (returns over mutations), locals over fields, fields over module state', 'Derive instead of sync', 'Name the invariant at the boundary' — and the 30-second test is a specific verification criterion, but there are no before/after examples illustrating application. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | As a simple single-purpose skill, the action is unambiguous: track the two axes, apply the collapse/shrink pattern, and verify with 'The test' — an explicit checkpoint. No destructive or batch operations, so no validation cap applies. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no need for external references, the body is well-organized into axes, Why, pattern, and test sections; the single cross-skill link to the context-window principle is one level deep and clearly signaled. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |