Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill is highly actionable with executable commands, code, and clear sequenced workflows, but it is somewhat verbose and ships a broken reference to a non-existent bundle file.
Suggestions
Create references/definition-of-done.md (or remove the See Also pointer) so the cited progressive-disclosure reference resolves to a real file.
Consolidate the overlapping Red Flags, Common Rationalizations, and Implementation Rules sections to reduce redundancy and tighten conciseness.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient and free of basic-concept padding, but it is verbose for a process skill with redundant sections (Red Flags, Common Rationalizations, and the Rules overlap) that could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides fully executable commands (npm test, npm run build, npx tsc --noEmit, npm run lint), complete TypeScript examples, concrete slicing walkthroughs, and a copy-paste agent prompt. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The Increment Cycle is a clearly sequenced Implement→Test→Verify→Commit loop with explicit validation checkpoints, supported by an Increment Checklist and a final Verification checklist. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well organized, but the body references references/definition-of-done.md (and the git-workflow-and-versioning skill) while no references/ bundle directory exists, leaving a dangling reference, and material that could be split out remains inline. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |