Content
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-engineered overview: concise, actionable, and clearly sequenced with a discovery flowchart and lifecycle that genuinely guide behavior. The one real weakness is progressive disclosure — it references a non-existent references/ file rather than shipping the bundle.
Suggestions
Create references/definition-of-done.md (the file the body cites) so the one-level-deep reference resolves to real content.
Consider splitting the full skill catalog (the Quick Reference table) into a references/skill-catalog.md file so SKILL.md stays a lean routing overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: the discovery flowchart, lifecycle sequence, and quick-reference table each earn their tokens without restating concepts Claude already knows, matching the 'every token earns its place' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete executable guidance is pervasive — the ASCII flowchart maps task shapes to named skills, the numbered lifecycle sequence lists exact skill chains, and behaviors like the ASSUMPTIONS template give copy-ready direction. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Multi-step processes are explicitly sequenced with checkpoints: the discovery flowchart branches by phase, the lifecycle sequence is numbered with a parallel-instrumentation note, and 'Verify, Don't Assume' defines an explicit evidence gate. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized and the body points one level deep to references/definition-of-done.md, but that references/ directory does not exist, so the signaling is not backed by an actual bundle — capping below the level-3 cleanly-split structure. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |