CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

acceptance-orchestrator

Use when a coding task should be driven end-to-end from issue intake through implementation, review, deployment, and acceptance verification with minimal human re-intervention.

Quality

84%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A tight, well-structured orchestration skill with an explicit state machine, validation gates, feedback loops, and a strong output contract. The main gaps are the absence of any executable examples or commands and the un-resolved references to required sub-skills.

Suggestions

Add concrete commands or a short example for at least one step (e.g., how to check issue status or what an evidence snippet looks like) to strengthen actionability.

Give the required sub-skills resolvable references (paths or explicit invocation instructions) instead of bare names, so a reader can navigate to them.

Add state transition detail (what moves intake -> issue-gated -> executing) or a compact diagram line so the state machine section is self-contained.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean bullet-style guidance with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows and no padding; every section (state machine, stop conditions, human gates, output contract) carries operational weight and the core rule is stated once.

5 / 5

Actionability

Concrete, specific guidance throughout (max 2 iteration rounds, polling 3m -> 6m -> 10m, dev-only default deploys, named output-contract fields), but there are no executable commands or examples, and the required sub-skills are referenced by bare name with no paths or invocation detail.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The six-step workflow is clearly sequenced with explicit validation gates (issue gate, completion gate requiring verification-before-completion), a feedback loop (escalate after 2 failed rounds), and checklists for stop conditions, escalation, human gates, and reporting.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized single-file structure with nothing inlined that belongs in a separate file, but at ~108 lines it exceeds the simple-skill threshold and the sub-skill references are bare names without links or paths, leaving minor navigation gaps.

4 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A solid trigger-focused description that clearly signals when to use the skill and scopes the lifecycle it covers. Its main weakness is that the "what" is embedded in the when-clause with passive phrasing rather than an explicit capability statement with active verbs.

Suggestions

Lead with an explicit capability sentence in third person (e.g., "Orchestrates coding tasks as a gated state machine from issue intake to verified acceptance") before the "Use when" clause.

Add natural trigger synonyms users would say, such as "autonomously", "hands-off", or "end to end from issue to deployment", to broaden keyword coverage.

State the concrete mechanism (state machine with stop conditions and escalation) in the description to sharpen distinctiveness against generic delivery skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the domain and several concrete lifecycle phases ("issue intake", "implementation", "review", "deployment", "acceptance verification"), but the skill's own actions are stated passively ("should be driven") with no active capability verbs, leaving minor gaps in coverage.

4 / 5

Completeness

The "when" is explicit and specific ("Use when a coding task should be driven end-to-end..."), and a "what" is present but fused inside the when-clause rather than stated as a standalone capability sentence, so it is not fully explicit on both.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural terms like "coding task", "end-to-end", "issue", "review", and "deployment" are present and would match user phrasing, but common synonyms such as "autonomously", "hands-off", or "ship it" are missing.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"acceptance verification with minimal human re-intervention" carves a fairly distinct niche, though the broad "coding task... implementation, review, deployment" framing has minor overlap risk with general delivery/orchestration skills.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository

administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills

Path

skills/acceptance-orchestrator/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.