Conciseness

The body is dense and assumes competence — no explanations of what WCAG or CDP are — with every section carrying operational content. Minor trimmable redundancy remains: the "When to Use" section repeats the frontmatter description verbatim and the generic "Limitations" boilerplate could be tightened, so it fits the 4 ("efficient; minor instances that could be trimmed") rather than the 5 anchor.

Actionability

Concrete guidance throughout: a flow preference order with named tools ("audit_live", "audit_html", "audit_diff({ audit_name: \"before\" })", "explain_rule({ id })"), a grep fallback chain ("data-testid, id, aria-label → visible text → tree position"), and a full report template. However, the actual call syntax for the audit tools is never shown and no bundle scripts back them — minor gaps matching the 4 anchor rather than fully copy-paste-ready 5.

Workflow Clarity

Both modes have clear sequences with explicit validation and feedback loops: fix mode runs a baseline audit, applies fixes, then verifies via "audit_diff" that "-fixed covers your targets and +new is empty", with bail conditions ("Verification fails ... name it and stop") and stop-and-ask checkpoints (>50 violations, >10 mechanical fixes, out-of-scope files). This matches the 5 anchor: explicit validation steps, error-recovery loops, and escalation checklists.

Progressive Disclosure

The body is well-organized into clearly signaled sections (modes, flows, scope, approach, recipe, bail conditions, output) with no nested references. However, it references five distinct tools/prompts ("audit_live", "audit-live-page prompt", "audit_html", "audit_diff", "explain_rule") whose backing files do not exist in the bundle (no scripts/ or references/ directory), a minor organization gap that fits the 4 anchor rather than the fully well-split 5.

Specificity

Multiple concrete actions are listed comprehensively: "Find and fix WCAG 2.2 accessibility issues", "sweep a codebase or page, produce a prioritized written report, no edits", "audit→edit→verify loop", and explicit preference for "direct-CDP live-DOM auditing" with fallbacks. Coverage of both modes and fallback strategies is comprehensive rather than leaving minor gaps, matching the 5 anchor.

Completeness

The "what" is clear and detailed (modes, fallbacks), but there is no "Use when..." clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance — the description never states when to invoke the skill. Per the judging guidelines, a missing 'Use when...' clause caps completeness at 3.

Trigger Term Quality

Good natural keyword coverage — "WCAG 2.2", "accessibility issues", "audit", "report", "fix" — but common user phrasings like "a11y", "screen reader", or "contrast" are absent. A few natural terms are missing, matching the 4 anchor rather than the comprehensive synonym coverage of 5.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"WCAG 2.2 accessibility issues" carves out a clear niche with distinct trigger terms (WCAG, accessibility, a11y audit), and the two-mode + tooling description is unlikely to fire for unrelated skills. Minimal conflict risk, matching the 5 anchor.