Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, highly actionable instruction-only body with a well-validated fix-mode workflow and clear sectioning. The only drags are a redundant 'When to Use' restatement and the absence of an explicit audit_live call signature and external reference files.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Largely lean and assumes Claude's competence without explaining basics (no 'what is WCAG' padding), but the 'When to Use' section restates the frontmatter description verbatim and the Limitations boilerplate could be trimmed, keeping it just below the fully-lean 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives concrete, specific tool invocations like `audit_diff({ audit_name: "before" })`, `explain_rule({ id: "<rule-id>" })`, and `format: "compact"`, but the primary `audit_live` flow is named without its call signature, leaving a minor gap versus copy-paste-ready 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The fix-mode recipe is an explicit Baseline → Plan+apply → Verify sequence with a real validation checkpoint (`audit_diff` against the baseline), feedback loops, and concrete bail conditions ('+new is empty', 'missing from -fixed'), matching the top anchor including for a batch/editing operation. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clearly headed sections with no nested references and easy navigation, but no bundle files exist and the full report-format template is inlined; it is well-structured yet not the cleanly split, one-level-deep-referenced ideal of a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |