Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, routing-style skill body with genuinely concrete commands and good behavioral guardrails (provenance discipline, waiting as a clean state). Its main weakness is the absence of any post-close verification in what is a batch, state-changing workflow, and the Example section is an empty shell that duplicates the description.
Suggestions
Add an explicit verification step to the workflow, e.g. re-run `acc commitments` after closing to confirm the intended closures landed and waiting items remain.
Replace the empty Example section with a worked example (listing output → one acc_act call → resulting state) or remove it; it currently only repeats the description.
Trim the "When to Use" section, which duplicates the frontmatter description verbatim, and note where the `<id>` ref comes from in the `acc commitments` output.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is short and lean — concrete commands in four tight steps plus one-line routing context, with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows. Minor trim opportunities keep it at anchor 4 rather than 5: "## When to Use" repeats the frontmatter description verbatim, and the Example section adds no content beyond quoting that same sentence. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, near-executable commands are given ("acc commitments", and the fully parameterized "acc_act(runtime=\"outcome\", input={\"ref\": \"<id>\", \"good\": true|false, \"note\": \"...\"})") plus explicit behavioral rules for owner/external/runtime tags. Anchor 4 fits: mostly executable with minor gaps — it never says where the ref id appears in the listing output nor what a good note contains, and the "Example" section shows no worked invocation. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1-4 form a clear sequence (list, close each closeable one, apply provenance discipline, leave waiting commitments open), but this is a batch operation over multiple state-changing acc_act calls with no validation of the result — nothing confirms a closure landed or re-checks the list afterward. Per the cap rule for batch operations without feedback loops, workflow clarity is capped at 3 ("steps listed but validation gaps"). | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, single-purpose, and needs no external references — no references/, scripts/, or assets/ directories exist and the body points to none. Sections (When to Use, numbered steps, Example, Limitations) are well-organized, so per the simple-skill scoring note it earns a 5 with just clear organization. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |