CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

amplitude-automation

Automate Amplitude tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): events, user activity, cohorts, user identification. Always search tools first for current schemas.

67

1.25x
Quality

60%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

68%

1.25x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/amplitude-automation/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is amplitude-automation in sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

62%Scale 1-3

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a solid integration skill with clear workflow sequencing, good pitfall documentation, and a useful quick reference table. Its main weaknesses are redundancy (pitfalls repeated in individual workflows and a summary section), lack of fully executable examples (mostly pseudocode steps), and a monolithic structure that could benefit from splitting detailed reference material into separate files.

Suggestions

Consolidate pitfalls into one section (either per-workflow or the summary 'Known Pitfalls') to eliminate redundancy and reduce token count.

Add at least one fully concrete, executable tool invocation example with realistic parameter values (e.g., a complete AMPLITUDE_SEND_EVENTS call with sample event data) rather than pseudocode steps.

Consider extracting the detailed per-workflow documentation into a separate reference file and keeping SKILL.md as a concise overview with the quick reference table and links.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The skill is reasonably well-structured but contains some redundancy—pitfalls are repeated across individual workflows and then again in the 'Known Pitfalls' section (e.g., user ID resolution, timestamps). The 'When to Use' footer adds no value. Some explanations could be tightened, but overall it's not excessively verbose.

2 / 3

Actionability

Tool sequences and key parameters are clearly listed, which is helpful. However, there are no fully executable code/command examples—the 'Common Patterns' section uses pseudocode-style numbered steps rather than actual tool invocations with concrete parameter values. The JSON example for user properties is a good start but most guidance remains descriptive rather than copy-paste ready.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Multi-step workflows are clearly sequenced with explicit prerequisite steps, tool ordering, and validation patterns. The async operation pattern includes a feedback loop (repeat status check until complete/error). The cohort workflow includes status checking as a verification step. Setup includes a clear 4-step verification sequence.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The content is well-organized with clear sections and a quick reference table, but it's a long monolithic document (~180 lines of substantive content) with no references to external files. The repeated pitfalls across sections and the consolidated 'Known Pitfalls' section suggest content that could benefit from being split into separate reference files.

2 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Description

57%Scale 1-3

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description identifies a clear niche (Amplitude automation via a specific MCP tool) which makes it distinctive, but it lacks specificity in what concrete actions are performed and omits an explicit 'Use when...' clause. The listed capabilities read more like category headers than actionable descriptions, and the trigger terms could better reflect natural user language.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause, e.g., 'Use when the user asks about Amplitude analytics, tracking events, querying user activity, or managing cohorts.'

Replace the category-style list with concrete actions, e.g., 'Query event data, look up user activity history, create and manage cohorts, identify users by properties' instead of just 'events, user activity, cohorts, user identification'.

Include natural user-facing trigger terms like 'analytics', 'track', 'Amplitude dashboard', 'event tracking', or 'user segmentation' to improve keyword coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain (Amplitude via Rube MCP/Composio) and lists some actions (events, user activity, cohorts, user identification), but these are more like category labels than concrete actions. It doesn't specify what it does with events or cohorts (create, query, delete?).

2 / 3

Completeness

The 'what' is partially addressed (automate Amplitude tasks), but there is no explicit 'Use when...' clause or equivalent trigger guidance. The instruction to 'always search tools first' is operational guidance rather than a trigger condition. Per rubric, missing 'Use when' caps completeness at 2.

2 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes relevant keywords like 'Amplitude', 'events', 'user activity', 'cohorts', and 'user identification', but these are somewhat generic. Missing natural user phrases like 'track events', 'analytics', 'funnel analysis', or 'Amplitude API'. 'Rube MCP (Composio)' is technical jargon unlikely to be used by users.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The combination of 'Amplitude' and 'Rube MCP (Composio)' creates a very specific niche that is unlikely to conflict with other skills. The tool and platform are clearly identified.

3 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Validation

90%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation10 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

10

/

11

Passed

Repository
administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.