Conciseness

The body is lean — a selection table, ready-to-run commands, and short step descriptions with almost no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. Minor trimmable cruft remains (the odd "(No need to check it upfront)" note and the vague "Based on character of use case"), so it fits 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation' rather than the fully lean score-5 anchor.

Actionability

Guidance is mostly executable: concrete bash commands for schema fetching and three ready-to-run script invocations with flags, plus a remediation list per error. It stops short of score 5 because placeholders like 'JSON_INPUT' lack a concrete example input, so the user must construct the argument without a template.

Workflow Clarity

A clear 5-step sequenced workflow with a copy-trackable checklist, an explicit decision table for Step 1, and an error-handling section covering failure recovery — matching 'clear sequence with most checkpoints present'. It is not 5 because there is no validation step between running the Actor and summarizing (e.g., verifying the run succeeded or output is non-empty before reporting), and not 3 because the operations are non-destructive and remediation guidance is present.

Progressive Disclosure

The body relies on ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/reference/scripts/run_actor.js, but no scripts/ (or references/) directory exists in the bundle — a dangling reference that leaves the core execution step unverifiable. All content (including the 15-actor table) is inlined in SKILL.md with no external references, fitting 'some structure but could be better organized; references present but not clearly signaled'.

Specificity

The description lists multiple concrete actions — "Find and evaluate influencers for brand partnerships, verify authenticity, and track collaboration performance" — plus four named platforms, giving comprehensive, specific coverage rather than generic domain language.

Completeness

The "what" is clear (find/evaluate/verify/track influencers across platforms) but there is no "Use when..." or equivalent explicit trigger guidance, which per the judging guidelines caps completeness at 3. It fits the anchor 'Has a clear what but when is missing or only weakly implied' — not 4 because no when-clause exists at all, and not 2 because the what is concrete, not vague.

Trigger Term Quality

Natural terms users would say are present ("influencers", "brand partnerships", "authenticity", "collaboration", and all four platform names), but common variations like "content creator", "creator marketing", or "sponsorship" are missing. Good coverage with a few natural terms absent, matching the score-4 anchor.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The influencer-marketing niche with named social platforms is mostly distinct with clear triggers, but it could overlap with generic social-media scraping or marketing-analytics skills, matching 'mostly distinct; minor overlap risk with closely related skills'.