Content
65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is well-structured and actionable with concrete commands and a helpful actor table, but it lacks validation checkpoints for its batch operations and references a script that is absent from the bundle.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation/verification checkpoint after Step 4 (e.g., confirm the run succeeded and the output file is non-empty before summarizing) to lift workflow clarity above the batch-operation cap.
Ship the referenced run_actor.js in scripts/ or remove the dangling reference so progressive disclosure resolves to real files.
Replace the generic 'When to Use' filler with concrete trigger guidance or remove it to tighten conciseness.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is largely lean with a useful actor-selection table and concrete commands, but the generic 'When to Use' line ('Use this skill when tackling tasks related to its primary domain or functionality as described above') is filler that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable bash commands with real flags and Actor IDs cover the common quick/CSV/JSON cases, though placeholders (ACTOR_ID, JSON_INPUT) must be substituted and the referenced run_actor.js script is not present in the bundle. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1-5 are clearly sequenced with a progress checklist and an error-handling section, but Apify actor runs are batch operations with no explicit validation/verification checkpoint, which caps workflow clarity at 3 per the rubric. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are organized per step, but the body references ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/reference/scripts/run_actor.js while the scripts/ bundle directory is empty, so the navigation target is missing and references are not actually resolvable. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |