Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, executable workflow: concrete commands, an excellent commit-to-bullet translation table, an explicit validation step, and clean one-level-deep offloading of detail into a real script and reference file. Its only weaknesses are slight redundancy (Overview/Resources restating known information) and no explicit error-recovery feedback loop in the workflow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — no explanations of git or App Store basics, and the workflow steps are one-line directives. Minor redundancy keeps it below anchor 5: the Overview restates the frontmatter description almost verbatim, and the Resources section re-describes what the workflow already says about the script. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is fully executable: the exact command with arguments ('scripts/collect_release_changes.sh v1.2.3 HEAD') is copy-paste ready and the referenced script exists, while the commit-to-bullet example table and the example output block concretely cover the common cases. It does not drop to 4 because no key execution detail is missing. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-step sequence (collect, triage, draft, validate) with an explicit validation step ('Ensure every bullet maps back to a real change', 'Check for duplicates') and an ask-for-clarification checkpoint, plus the referenced QA checklist. It is not 5 because there is no explicit error-recovery feedback loop (e.g., what to do when the script fails or the range is wrong) beyond the noted no-tags fallback. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview with well-signaled, one-level-deep references — 'scripts/collect_release_changes.sh' and 'references/release-notes-guidelines.md' both exist, are listed in a Resources section, and carry the detailed language/filtering/QA rules while the body keeps only the workflow. Content is appropriately split and easy to navigate. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |