Content
46%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise and well-sectioned with clear use/do-not-use triggers, but the actual guidance is thin: all concrete detail is deferred to an implementation playbook that is missing from the bundle, and the instruction steps remain high-level directives with no selection criteria or validation checkpoints. Fixing the dangling reference is the highest-impact repair.
Suggestions
Ship the referenced bundle file (resources/implementation-playbook.md) or remove/inline the reference — the skill defers all specifics to a file that does not exist, making the deferral a dead end.
Make instruction steps concrete and executable, e.g. decision criteria for choosing Clean vs. Hexagonal vs. DDD based on domain complexity, and example module/dependency-rule structures.
Define the promised validation explicitly: what "validation checks" to run after defining boundaries or migrations (e.g. dependency-direction checks, test-seam verification), turning step 4 into a real checkpoint.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and free of concepts Claude already knows, with terse sections ("Use this skill when", "Do not use this skill when", five instruction steps). It falls short of anchor 5 only through minor redundancy: the frontmatter description is restated verbatim as the intro line, and the playbook reference appears twice (in Instructions and again in Resources). | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The instructions are high-level hints without specific executable steps: "Select an architecture pattern that fits the domain complexity" offers no selection criteria, and "Define module boundaries, interfaces, and dependency rules" gives no concrete method, example, or checklist. All specifics are deferred to a playbook file that is not present in the bundle, so the guidance as written cannot be executed, matching anchor 2. | 2 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A rough sequence is present (clarify domain boundaries, select pattern, define boundaries/interfaces, provide migration steps and validation checks), but validation is only mentioned by name with no checkpoints or feedback loops defined, matching anchor 3. It is not anchor 2 because the steps are ordered and reasonably defined, and not anchor 4 because there are no concrete validation commands or checks. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body's only substantive detail is deferred to "resources/implementation-playbook.md", but no bundle files exist at all (no references/, scripts/, assets/, or resources/ directories), so the referenced path is dangling and the deferred content is unreachable. Structure and sectioning are decent, but scored against the actual (empty) bundle structure, the single reference is broken, leaving the skill's promised depth undelivered — matching the minimal-structure anchor 2. | 2 / 5 |
Total | 11 / 20 Passed |