CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

azd-deployment

Deploy containerized frontend + backend applications to Azure Container Apps with remote builds, managed identity, and idempotent infrastructure.

60

Quality

70%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/azd-deployment/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is azd-deployment in sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

72%Scale 1-3

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a solid, well-structured skill that provides highly actionable guidance for Azure Container Apps deployment with azd. Its main weakness is the lack of explicit validation checkpoints and error recovery steps in the deployment workflow—there's no guidance on what to do when `azd up` fails or how to verify a successful deployment beyond streaming logs. Some sections (particularly the full azure.yaml example with placeholder echo hooks) could be tightened for conciseness.

Suggestions

Add explicit validation steps after `azd up` (e.g., check deployment status, verify endpoints respond, validate resource creation) to improve workflow clarity.

Add a brief error recovery section: what to check when `azd up` or `azd provision` fails, common failure modes, and how to retry safely.

Trim the full azure.yaml example—the placeholder echo statements in hooks add no value; either show real hook commands or remove them and reference the hooks section separately.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The skill is mostly efficient but includes some sections that could be tightened—the full azure.yaml configuration with placeholder echo statements adds bulk, and the hooks examples for preserving manual changes are somewhat verbose. However, it generally avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows.

2 / 3

Actionability

The skill provides fully executable code blocks throughout—bash commands, YAML configurations, Bicep templates, JSON parameter files, and nginx config snippets are all concrete and copy-paste ready. Key options are documented in a clear table format.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The Quick Start provides a clear sequence, and the idempotent deployment section explains the flow well. However, there are no explicit validation checkpoints—after running `azd up`, there's no 'verify deployment succeeded' step, no error recovery guidance for failed provisions, and the hooks for preserving custom domains lack a complete restore step.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The skill has a clear Quick Start overview, well-organized sections with headers, and appropriately references external files (bicep-patterns.md, troubleshooting.md, azure-yaml-schema.md) for deeper content. Navigation is one level deep and clearly signaled.

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

67%Scale 1-3

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is technically specific and clearly identifies a distinct niche around Azure Container Apps deployment. Its main weakness is the absence of an explicit 'Use when...' clause, which would help Claude know exactly when to select this skill. Adding natural trigger terms and user-facing language variations would also improve discoverability.

Suggestions

Add a 'Use when...' clause, e.g., 'Use when the user wants to deploy applications to Azure Container Apps, set up ACA infrastructure, or configure containerized deployments on Azure.'

Include common user-facing trigger term variations such as 'ACA', 'Docker', 'Azure deployment', 'container deployment', and 'Bicep/ARM templates'.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'Deploy containerized frontend + backend applications', 'remote builds', 'managed identity', 'idempotent infrastructure'. These are concrete, specific capabilities rather than vague language.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers 'what does this do' (deploy containerized apps to Azure Container Apps with specific features), but lacks an explicit 'Use when...' clause or equivalent trigger guidance, which caps this at 2 per the rubric guidelines.

2 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes good terms like 'Azure Container Apps', 'containerized', 'deploy', 'managed identity', and 'frontend + backend'. However, it misses common user variations like 'ACA', 'container apps', 'Azure deployment', 'Docker', or '.bicep'. Users might say 'deploy to Azure' or 'set up containers on Azure' which aren't well covered.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Very specific niche: Azure Container Apps deployment with frontend + backend, remote builds, managed identity, and idempotent infrastructure. This is unlikely to conflict with generic deployment skills or other cloud provider skills.

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Validation

90%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation10 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

10

/

11

Passed

Repository
administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.