CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

azure-ai-agents-persistent-dotnet

Azure AI Agents Persistent SDK for .NET. Low-level SDK for creating and managing AI agents with threads, messages, runs, and tools.

65

2.40x
Quality

48%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

96%

2.40x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills-claude/skills/azure-ai-agents-persistent-dotnet/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is azure-ai-agents-persistent-dotnet in sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

64%Scale 1-3

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a solid, highly actionable SDK reference skill with excellent executable code examples covering the full range of Azure AI Agents Persistent functionality. Its main weaknesses are its length (could benefit from splitting tool-specific examples into separate files) and the lack of explicit validation/error-recovery steps within the workflows. Some generic best practices and the placeholder 'When to Use' section add unnecessary tokens.

Suggestions

Add explicit validation checkpoints in the core workflow, e.g., checking run.Status for Failed/Cancelled after polling and showing error recovery patterns inline

Move tool-specific examples (sections 5-8) into a separate TOOLS.md file and reference it from the main skill to improve progressive disclosure and reduce token load

Remove the placeholder 'When to Use' section and trim generic best practices that Claude already knows (e.g., 'use async methods', 'use using statements')

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The skill is fairly efficient with executable code examples and reference tables, but it's quite long (~300 lines) with some sections that could be consolidated. The 'Best Practices' section contains some generic advice Claude already knows (e.g., 'use async methods', 'use using statements'). The 'When to Use' section is a meaningless placeholder.

2 / 3

Actionability

Excellent actionability with fully executable C# code examples for every major workflow: agent creation, threading, polling, streaming, function calling, file search, Bing grounding, AI Search, and error handling. All examples are copy-paste ready with proper imports and realistic parameters.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The core workflow is clearly numbered (1-9) with a logical sequence from creation to cleanup. However, there are no explicit validation checkpoints — for example, no guidance on checking if vector store creation succeeded before using it, no error handling within the polling loop, and no feedback loops for failed runs beyond mentioning 'Handle all run statuses' in best practices.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The content is well-structured with clear headers and reference tables, but it's monolithic — all tool examples are inline rather than being split into separate files. The reference links at the bottom are helpful, but the skill would benefit from moving detailed tool examples (Bing, AI Search, File Search) into separate referenced files while keeping the core workflow lean.

2 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Description

32%Scale 1-3

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description identifies a specific technology domain (Azure AI Agents Persistent SDK for .NET) and lists key SDK concepts, which provides some distinctiveness. However, it lacks a 'Use when...' clause, reads more like a subtitle than a functional description, and doesn't articulate concrete actions Claude would perform with this skill. The description needs explicit trigger guidance and more actionable capability statements.

Suggestions

Add a 'Use when...' clause with trigger terms like 'Use when the user asks about Azure AI Agents SDK, creating persistent agents in C#/.NET, managing agent threads, or using the Azure.AI.Projects namespace'.

Replace abstract SDK concepts with concrete actions, e.g., 'Creates and configures AI agents, manages conversation threads and messages, executes agent runs, and integrates tools like code interpreter and file search using the Azure AI Agents Persistent SDK for .NET'.

Include common user-facing synonyms and variations such as 'C#', 'Azure OpenAI agents', 'PersistentAgentsClient', or 'Azure.AI.Projects' to improve trigger term coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain (Azure AI Agents SDK for .NET) and lists some concepts (threads, messages, runs, tools), but these are more like SDK abstractions than concrete user-facing actions. It doesn't describe specific actions like 'create agents', 'manage conversation threads', or 'configure tool integrations'.

2 / 3

Completeness

Describes what the skill covers (Azure AI Agents SDK concepts) but completely lacks a 'Use when...' clause or any explicit trigger guidance for when Claude should select this skill. Per rubric guidelines, a missing 'Use when' clause caps completeness at 2, and the 'what' portion is also only moderately clear, warranting a score of 1.

1 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes relevant keywords like 'Azure', 'AI Agents', '.NET', 'SDK', 'threads', 'messages', 'runs', and 'tools' which users might mention. However, it misses common variations like 'C#', 'Azure OpenAI', 'assistant API', 'agent orchestration', or 'PersistentAgentsClient'.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The mention of 'Azure AI Agents Persistent SDK for .NET' is fairly specific and distinguishes it from generic coding skills. However, it could overlap with other Azure SDK skills, general .NET skills, or broader AI agent frameworks without clearer scoping.

2 / 3

Total

7

/

12

Passed

Validation

90%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation10 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

10

/

11

Passed

Repository
administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.