CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

azure-ai-contentsafety-ts

Analyze text and images for harmful content with customizable blocklists.

59

Quality

69%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills-claude/skills/azure-ai-contentsafety-ts/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is azure-ai-contentsafety-ts in sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

72%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The skill is highly actionable with executable code across the main operations, but it is a monolithic reference doc lacking progressive disclosure and an explicit multi-step workflow with validation checkpoints.

Suggestions

Move the full Key Types and API Endpoints reference into a separate reference file linked from the body to apply progressive disclosure.

Add an end-to-end moderation workflow (analyze → check thresholds → match blocklists → decide/audit) with explicit validation and retry checkpoints.

Replace the vacuous 'When to Use' line with concrete trigger conditions or remove it entirely to tighten conciseness.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly lean, code-first content with no padding of basic concepts, but the generic 'When to Use' line ('applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview') is fluff that could be trimmed.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides copy-paste-ready TypeScript covering the common cases — text analysis, image analysis (base64 and blob URL), blocklist CRUD, and a moderation helper — with real endpoints and types.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Operations are presented as discrete recipes, each with an isUnexpected() error check, but there is no end-to-end multi-step workflow with explicit validation checkpoints, leaving sequence-checkpoint gaps.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist and the ~300-line body inlines content that could be split (full type reference, endpoint table, blocklist management) into separate files; section headers give structure but there are no signaled one-level references.

3 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

66%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is concrete and names a clear niche, but it omits any explicit 'when to use' trigger guidance, which the rubric penalizes by capping completeness at 3.

Suggestions

Add a 'Use when...' clause with concrete trigger phrases, e.g. 'Use when analyzing text or images for harmful content, setting up content moderation, or managing custom blocklists.'

Include natural synonyms users say, such as 'content moderation', 'filter', or 'flag', to broaden trigger coverage.

Mirror the harm categories (Hate, Sexual, Violence, SelfHarm) in the description to sharpen distinctiveness from generic moderation skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain and several concrete actions — 'Analyze text and images for harmful content with customizable blocklists' — covering analysis of two media types plus blocklist customization, with only minor coverage gaps.

4 / 5

Completeness

It clearly answers what the skill does but has no 'Use when...' or equivalent trigger guidance, which caps completeness at 3 per the rubric.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

'harmful content' and 'blocklists' are natural user phrases, but common synonyms like 'content moderation', 'filter', or 'flag' are missing.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The harmful-content-analysis-with-blocklists niche is mostly distinct, with only minor overlap risk against generic moderation skills.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.