CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

blockchain-developer

Build production-ready Web3 applications, smart contracts, and decentralized systems. Implements DeFi protocols, NFT platforms, DAOs, and enterprise blockchain integrations.

62

1.01x
Quality

45%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

90%

1.01x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills-claude/skills/blockchain-developer/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is blockchain-developer in sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

25%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body functions as a verbose persona/encyclopedia rather than actionable skill guidance: it enumerates capabilities Claude already knows, provides no executable code or validation checkpoints, and references a bundle file that does not exist. It needs to be replaced with lean, concrete, well-structured instructions.

Suggestions

Replace the capability inventories, Behavioral Traits, and Knowledge Base with concise, actionable guidance and executable code/command examples for the most common tasks (e.g., a Hardhat/Foundry contract scaffold, a deployment command, an audit checklist).

Add an explicit validation step in the Response Approach workflow (e.g., run `forge test` / `slither .` and only deploy on a clean pass) to satisfy the destructive-operation checkpoint requirement.

Create the referenced `resources/implementation-playbook.md` (or move it under an existing `references/` dir) and move the bulk of the capability detail there, keeping SKILL.md a lean overview with clearly signaled one-level-deep references.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The 200-line body is a padded persona inventory enumerating chains, tools, and standards Claude largely already knows (e.g., "Layer 2 scaling solutions: Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, Base, zkSync"), with several unnecessary padded sections rather than lean, earned tokens.

2 / 5

Actionability

There is no executable code or specific commands; the Instructions and Response Approach give only high-level hints ("Implement production-ready code", "Include gas optimization"), missing the concrete steps needed to execute.

2 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The 8-step Response Approach is a rough, poorly-defined sequence with no validation checkpoints for destructive contract-deployment operations, which is below the midpoint and capped by the missing-validation rule.

2 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist and the sole reference targets a non-existent path (`resources/implementation-playbook.md`); the large capability and knowledge-base inventories that belong in separate files are inlined into SKILL.md.

2 / 5

Total

8

/

20

Passed

Description

66%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific and covers the core blockchain subdomains with natural trigger terms, but it omits any explicit 'Use when' guidance, which caps its completeness. It is otherwise clear and reasonably distinct from unrelated skills.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause naming concrete trigger phrases (e.g., 'Use when building or auditing smart contracts, DeFi protocols, NFT marketplaces, DAOs, or Web3 dApps').

Include natural synonyms and tool names users actually say (Ethereum, Solidity, crypto, dApp, token) to broaden trigger coverage.

Tighten the capability list from broad categories to a few concrete, granular actions to push specificity toward 5.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists several concrete actions ("Build production-ready Web3 applications, smart contracts, and decentralized systems", "Implements DeFi protocols, NFT platforms, DAOs, and enterprise blockchain integrations"), though they are broad domain categories rather than granular operations, so a 5 is not earned.

4 / 5

Completeness

The description gives a clear "what" but contains no "Use when..." trigger clause; per the judging guidelines, a missing explicit trigger guidance caps completeness at 3.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural user-facing keywords like Web3, smart contracts, DeFi, NFT, DAOs, and blockchain, but omits common synonyms such as crypto, Ethereum, Solidity, token, or dApp, so coverage is good rather than comprehensive.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The blockchain/Web3 niche is mostly distinct with clear triggers, but its broad scope (smart contracts, DeFi, NFTs, DAOs, enterprise integration) creates minor overlap risk with general backend or web developer skills.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.