Content
61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable guide to Box MCP tool orchestration with clear sequenced workflows and concrete parameters. Its main weaknesses are redundant pitfall restatements and missing validation feedback loops around destructive operations.
Suggestions
Consolidate the 'Known Pitfalls' section to avoid restating ID formats, pagination, and nested-parameter details already covered in per-workflow Pitfalls.
Add explicit validation feedback loops for destructive and batch operations (e.g., verify folder is empty or confirm recursive deletion before BOX_DELETE_FOLDER; confirm permissions before permanent removal).
Provide one or two concrete tool-call invocation examples showing the actual parameter values for a representative upload or search workflow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with tight tool sequences and parameters, but the 'Known Pitfalls' section re-states ID formats, pagination, and nested-parameter details already covered in per-workflow Pitfalls, adding redundancy. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete tool slugs, exact parameter names (parent__id, lock__access), and URL-to-ID extraction rules give mostly executable guidance, though no concrete invocation examples are shown. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Tool sequences are clearly numbered with prerequisite/required/optional tags and setup validation, but destructive operations (delete/permanently remove folder, bulk ops) lack explicit validate-then-proceed feedback loops, capping at 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, but the single file is well-organized with clear section headers and a quick-reference table, appropriate for a self-contained skill; minor organization gaps from the duplicated pitfalls sections. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |