Content
22%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill is essentially a table of contents with no substantive content. It lacks any concrete guidance—no tool names (e.g., conventional-changelog, release-please), no commit format examples, no configuration snippets, and no executable commands. The entire actionable content is deferred to a referenced file, leaving the SKILL.md itself nearly useless as a standalone reference.
Suggestions
Add concrete, executable examples: include a conventional commit format template (e.g., 'feat(scope): description'), a sample tool configuration (e.g., release-please config or conventional-changelog CLI command), and an example generated changelog entry.
Provide a clear multi-step workflow with specific tool commands, e.g., '1. Install release-please: `npm install release-please` 2. Configure `.release-please-manifest.json` 3. Run: `release-please ...' with validation steps.
Include at least one concrete commit message example with input/output showing how a commit becomes a changelog entry, similar to the rubric's good example for commit message formatting.
Either inline the key patterns from `resources/implementation-playbook.md` as a quick-start section or provide a meaningful summary so the SKILL.md is useful without requiring the referenced file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The 'Use this skill when' and 'Do not use this skill when' sections add moderate overhead without providing actionable value. The instructions themselves are lean but vague, so the content isn't padded with explanations of known concepts but does include some unnecessary framing. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The instructions are entirely abstract ('Select a changelog format', 'Enforce commit conventions', 'Configure tooling') with no concrete commands, code examples, tool names, configuration snippets, or specific commit format templates. Nothing is copy-paste ready or executable. | 1 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The steps are vague directives without specific sequencing, validation checkpoints, or feedback loops. There's no indication of what tools to run, how to verify output, or how to recover from errors. The workflow is essentially 'do the thing, then review it.' | 1 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | There is a reference to `resources/implementation-playbook.md` for detailed patterns, which is one-level deep and clearly signaled. However, the SKILL.md itself provides almost no substantive overview content, making it an empty shell that delegates nearly everything to the referenced file. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 6 / 12 Passed |