CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

cicd-automation-workflow-automate

You are a workflow automation expert specializing in creating efficient CI/CD pipelines, GitHub Actions workflows, and automated development processes. Design and implement automation that reduces manual work, improves consistency, and accelerates delivery while maintaining quality and security.

48

Quality

51%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills/skills/cicd-automation-workflow-automate/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is cicd-automation-workflow-automate in rmyndharis/antigravity-skills

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

42%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is well structured and reasonably concise but offers only abstract guidance with no executable examples, and its workflow lacks validation checkpoints for destructive deploy operations. Its single external reference points to a file that is absent from the bundle.

Suggestions

Add a minimal executable example, e.g. a skeleton GitHub Actions workflow YAML showing jobs/stages/caching, so guidance is concrete rather than directional.

Insert an explicit validation checkpoint into the workflow (e.g. 'Run quality gates and scan results; only proceed to deploy when green') to satisfy the destructive-operation feedback-loop requirement.

Either create `resources/implementation-playbook.md` or remove the two references to it, so progressive-disclosure navigation is not broken.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is generally lean and sectioned, but the opening paragraph duplicates the frontmatter description verbatim and the 'Context' section restates the same intent, which is unnecessary padding; not a 2 because the rest is tight.

3 / 5

Actionability

Instructions are high-level hints ('Define pipeline stages with caching, artifacts, and quality gates', 'Add security scans, secret handling, and approvals') with no concrete commands, workflow YAML, or executable examples, matching the minimal-concrete-guidance anchor rather than the 3 which would require some executable detail.

2 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A rough sequence exists (inventory → define stages → add security → document rollout), but there are no validation checkpoints or feedback loops, and because the skill drives destructive deploy/secret operations the missing-validation cap holds workflow clarity at 3 even though steps are listed.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Sections are well organized and a one-level reference to `resources/implementation-playbook.md` is clearly signaled in both Instructions and Resources, but that referenced file does not exist in the bundle (no resources/ directory), so navigation is broken; the dangling reference keeps this at 3 rather than 4.

3 / 5

Total

11

/

20

Passed

Description

61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description names a clear domain and several actions but leans on benefit language rather than concrete operations, uses second-person voice, and omits any explicit 'Use when' trigger guidance, which caps completeness. It is reasonably distinct from other skills.

Suggestions

Rewrite in third person ('Designs and implements CI/CD pipelines...') to recover the specificity penalty and match skill-description conventions.

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. 'Use when automating CI/CD or release pipelines, designing GitHub Actions workflows, or replacing manual build/test/deploy steps.'

Replace benefit-outcome verbs ('reduces manual work', 'improves consistency') with concrete technical actions ('scaffolds multi-stage workflows, configures caching and artifacts, wires quality gates and secret scanning').

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain (CI/CD pipelines, GitHub Actions) and actions like 'Design and implement automation', but the listed actions ('reduces manual work', 'improves consistency', 'accelerates delivery') are benefit-oriented outcomes rather than concrete technical operations; additionally the second-person voice ('You are a workflow automation expert') triggers the -1 voice penalty, pulling a base of 4 down to 3.

3 / 5

Completeness

Clearly states what the skill does (creates CI/CD pipelines, GitHub Actions workflows, automation) but provides no 'Use when...' trigger guidance, so per the missing-trigger-clause cap completeness cannot exceed 3.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural terms users would say such as 'CI/CD pipelines', 'GitHub Actions workflows', and 'automated development processes', but is missing common synonyms like 'release pipeline', 'deployment', and 'continuous integration/delivery'.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The CI/CD pipelines + GitHub Actions niche is mostly distinct with only minor overlap risk against closely related deployment or git skills; not a 5 because 'automation' is broad enough to brush against general dev-tooling skills.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
administrakt0r/AI-Agents-Safe-Coding-Skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.